The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Updated after seeing IFA before I drawdown (L&G pension)? & SJP keen to combine

2

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,509 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
     I spoke to L&G and they were pretty useless. 
    Remember that the provider is very limited in what they can say.  They cannot give advice or opinion.

    obviously there are thousands of choices but surely there must be a top 5 providers for straightforward investment of a pension worth £200k. 
    No there is not.    Its like buying any product.    What is best for one person isnt best for another.    Tell me what the best 5 cars are (for example)?   Or the best 5 TVs?

    And realistically, 200k is high enough to get some good options hat someone with £20k would not be able to get.


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • DeadlyD
    DeadlyD Posts: 136 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    dunstonh said:
     I spoke to L&G and they were pretty useless. 
    Remember that the provider is very limited in what they can say.  They cannot give advice or opinion.

    obviously there are thousands of choices but surely there must be a top 5 providers for straightforward investment of a pension worth £200k. 
    No there is not.    Its like buying any product.    What is best for one person isnt best for another.    Tell me what the best 5 cars are (for example)?   Or the best 5 TVs?

    And realistically, 200k is high enough to get some good options hat someone with £20k would not be able to get.


    I like the analogy! reading through the articles that @xylophone kindly provided I am becoming more educated. 
    A flexible drawdown pension that is managed - a SIPP,  the Vanguard article is informative . But rather than engage with an IFA (I'm concerned given my experience with the SJP consultant and ) can a provider manage as well? such as H&L? 
    That's what I am ideally looking for.

  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,169 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 23 June 2023 at 8:59PM
    DeadlyD said:
    dunstonh said:
     I spoke to L&G and they were pretty useless. 
    Remember that the provider is very limited in what they can say.  They cannot give advice or opinion.

    obviously there are thousands of choices but surely there must be a top 5 providers for straightforward investment of a pension worth £200k. 
    No there is not.    Its like buying any product.    What is best for one person isnt best for another.    Tell me what the best 5 cars are (for example)?   Or the best 5 TVs?

    And realistically, 200k is high enough to get some good options hat someone with £20k would not be able to get.


    I like the analogy! reading through the articles that @xylophone kindly provided I am becoming more educated. 
    A flexible drawdown pension that is managed - a SIPP,  the Vanguard article is informative . But rather than engage with an IFA (I'm concerned given my experience with the SJP consultant and ) can a provider manage as well? such as H&L? 
    That's what I am ideally looking for.


    If you chose HL, you would need to choose one or more funds. You could choose a Vanguard fund like the life strategy 60 or 80, or a similar fund from another fund manager, such as Blackrock or HSBC. You could look at it every year or so and decide if you were still happy with it.
    HL would probably be expensive for £200k, but there are cheaper platforms, such as AJ Bell or II.
    None of the platforms would do any "managing", that is the job of the fund manager (Vanguard etc).
    Your annual review and decision to stick or twist would be another level / type of management.
    I believe studies have suggested that the most successful DIY investors are deceased - they don't do many fund changes!
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,509 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 23 June 2023 at 11:05PM
    A flexible drawdown pension that is managed - a SIPP,  the Vanguard article is informative . But rather than engage with an IFA (I'm concerned given my experience with the SJP consultant and ) can a provider manage as well? such as H&L? 
    SJP are not IFAs.  So, comparing them with an IFA isn't really fair.   And a provider that provides management advice/solutions is actually closer to SJP. i.e... HL is restricted just as SJP are.

    That's what I am ideally looking for.
    If you want someone to tell you what to do then that is an IFA.   If you want to select simple investments that you can invest and forget, then that is you picking a fund that does that.  If you want a sales rep to sell you their own product and funds then that is something you should avoid.


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • DeadlyD
    DeadlyD Posts: 136 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    dunstonh said:
    A flexible drawdown pension that is managed - a SIPP,  the Vanguard article is informative . But rather than engage with an IFA (I'm concerned given my experience with the SJP consultant and ) can a provider manage as well? such as H&L? 
    SJP are not IFAs.  So, comparing them with an IFA isn't really fair.   And a provider that provides management advice/solutions is actually closer to SJP. i.e... HL is restricted just as SJP are.

    That's what I am ideally looking for.
    If you want someone to tell you what to do then that is an IFA.   If you want to select simple investments that you can invest and forget, then that is you picking a fund that does that.  If you want a sales rep to sell you their own product and funds then that is something you should avoid.


    Right. So for the uninformed this is very helpful. My understanding is:-
    Pension providers eg L&G don’t provide advice. Unless they have a fund management team. 
    Some providers eg SJP & H&L provide sales reps AKA Financial Advisors. 
    Funds such as Vanguard, Fidelity can be managed as a DIY option. 
    I have no desire to manage my own funds so I’m looking for a reputable IFA. However, my first encounter with a “Financial Advisor” was SJP who were economical with the truth leading me astray so I am suspicious of trusting an IFA. 
    No wonder the sectors got a bad rep. finding out this information is not easy and then you have to trust an IFA which is basically finding one from a directory. 
    Appreciate your help! 
  • DeadlyD
    DeadlyD Posts: 136 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    DeadlyD said:
    xylophone said:





    thanks @xylophone I will have a read through tomorrow! Mainly interested in finding a provider with funds for a SIPP that has a good ( at least market expectations) % return. 
    Thank you @xylophone again for the article and helping through this minefield that is financial pension planning! I have now found a local IFA and will advise you of the outcome shortly! 
  • DeadlyD
    DeadlyD Posts: 136 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    I have taken your advice @dunstonh and @xylophone. I understand the differences between providers, fund management, DIY and engaging an IFA, the latter which I was reticent to do due to my difficult experiences in engaging a Financial expert to transfer my DB pension and with SJP. I've now found a local independent and will report back! 
    Thanks all on this engaging platform - invaluable financial expertise. 
    DeadlyD
  • ian16527
    ian16527 Posts: 250 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 June 2023 at 5:53PM
    I had L&G PMC multi asset funds in my works pension. They were usually called accelerated growth etc.
    I self selected as they were poor performers, lot of UK bias.
    Can you not download the latest fact sheet and compare the performance to say VG LS80 or LS60 for example. This would give you an idea of what the differences are in performance
  • DeadlyD
    DeadlyD Posts: 136 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 September 2023 at 5:16PM
    DeadlyD said:
    I have taken your advice @dunstonh and @xylophone. I understand the differences between providers, fund management, DIY and engaging an IFA, the latter which I was reticent to do due to my difficult experiences in engaging a Financial expert to transfer my DB pension and with SJP. I've now found a local independent and will report back! 
    Thanks all on this engaging platform - invaluable financial expertise. 
    DeadlyD
    Update 
    @dunstonh @xylophone and Forumites! 
    IFA found via unbiased aligned to Flying Colours Limited (practices under / acts as a representative of) 

    IFA Recommendation
    Combine L&G unmanaged & SJP managed(latter has 1.4% penalty I am in yr3 of a 5yr agreement) ongoing charges .37% & 1.72% respectively
    Fund - Aviva Vanguard 80 

    IFA charges
    Transfer charge for L&G - 1.5% 
    Ongoing management - .75%
    No transfer on SJP see above penalty 
    Ongoing management 1% 

    My strategy for retirement this year and the following 
    - Use the tax free allowance = £12,750
    - Tax free pension £4,190 

    Option to withdraw lump sums at anytime eg £20k of the tax free amount 

    My questions are;- 
    - Is this a sensible recommendation? What other considerations are there?  IFA charges - any comments? 

    Appreciated,
    DeadlyD

     

  • gm0
    gm0 Posts: 1,151 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The L&G multi-asset 3 fund is meant to deliver lower volatility than pure equities and be a "slow and steady" fund. 
    It provides access to a mix of FI assets alongside equities.  (NTW3).

    "To provide long-term investment growth through exposure to a diversified range of asset
    classes. The diversified nature of the Fund means that the Fund is expected to have less
    exposure than an equity-only fund to adverse equity market conditions. However, the Fund
    may perform less strongly than an equity-only fund in benign or positive market conditions."

    As it goes it delivered an unwelcome surprise last year with bond capital values unwinding with interest rates rising rapidly alongside for a time an equity drop (albeit then an equity recovery).   

    As did all multi-assets with lower equities and a chunk of medium duration corporate and government bonds.  And portfolios where the bond funds were broken out separately but still present.

    If you graph it on trustnet against Vanguard VLS 40 it should perform "similarly" because that is the kind of animal that it is.  There are type of credit and home market and FX risk differences.  And they are not the same - but to a first approximation both are 40% equities multi-asset funds

    I set up some portfolios early last year and am familiar with this fund.

    Today the Multi-Asset 3 is still down circa 5% from Feb 2022. 
    The pure global developed equities (ex UK) bought the same day is now up 7% and the UK fund is up 2%.  
    Whatever that tells us.

    Yes it has a higher UK bias.  And the bonds content last year was a difference. 
    In a particular and unusual period.  The bond correction unwinds prior gains from low interest rates and QE period.
    The nature of the bond mixtures and currency risks are different from funds with lower UK mixtures.

    The version I have access to is quite cheap for a multi-asset 0.13% for what it is.  Many basic multi-asset passives are 0.2x% and up.

    It isn't MEANT to perform like a passive "all equities" indexer.  And it doesn't.

    The two relevant questions are - is it a sensible mixture for you - age, risk appetite, goals - as a one and done (less likely).  Or as a cheap (lower volatility) building block in a bigger portfolio.  And if it is, which of the similar funds that could provide that function would be sensible.

    Data point

    L&G PMC Multi-asset 3 - cumulative 15.8% over 5 years
    2022 -7.10
    2021 12.65
    2020 1.40
    2019 7.91

    Vanguard LS 40 - cumulative 10.2% over 5 years.
    2022 -13.6
    2021 5.7
    2020 7.7
    2019 12.4
    2018 -2.3







    So it's a "bad fund".  No it's not.  It's what it is. Slightly spicier than VLS40.  Less spicy than VLS60.  Different mix of credit stuff.  Different UK vs World equities performance risk and Currency FX risk mix due to UK gilts and UK equity mixtures being richer.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.7K Life & Family
  • 256.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.