We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Resolution Life endowment cut and run?

2»

Comments

  • peterbaker
    peterbaker Posts: 3,083 Forumite
    philuws wrote:
    ...As for complaints the rumour is coming from the guys in charge at Life company investor group that they will treat complaints in the same way as normal and are not going to adhere to the 'time barring' principle.
    Ehm, as someone who learned principles of insurance a long time ago I think your use, Phil, of the word "principle" here in your sentence is inadvertently a tad misleading:-) I suggest the word "con-trick" gets the idea across better.
  • I am also in this predicament and have a current estimated shortfall of anything up to 30K I believe. Would it make any sense to take the 18k surrender value out and put it into a 'buy to let' property as opposed to adding this surrender value into my mortgage along with the monthly payments I was making to the endowment company and offset the mortgage. Would there be any downside to doing a buy to let that I would loose out on, or would it be a better option as long as the buy to let/property market stayed buoyant. Appreciate any help in this, cheers. :beer:
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Would it make any sense to take the 18k surrender value out and put it into a 'buy to let' property as opposed to adding this surrender value into my mortgage along with the monthly payments I was making to the endowment company and offset the mortgage. Would there be any downside to doing a buy to let that I would loose out on, or would it be a better option as long as the buy to let/property

    Out of one scheme which has risk into another. The actual yield on buy to lets is very low now. You would be doing it after the good times.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.