We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Budget 15th March2023, any pension changes predictions or views?
Comments
-
Similar situation here. All my plans were set for 55 but were forced to change to 57. I’m considering whether to divert more funds to ISAs, rather than the pension, to bridge the gap. An extra year added to that gap is certainly not welcome.artyboy said:As someone born less than a week the wrong side of the 55 to 57 pension withdrawal age change, I will be less than chuffed if there's a further rise to 58 that impacts me.An unfreezing and immediate meaningful rise to the LTA will go some way to offsetting my ire, but frankly I don't need the government nannying me suggesting my money might run out if I retire too soon. Or worse, trying to wield a stick to keep me working. Not going to happen, will just have to utilise other assets to bridge...0 -
Well above what I would have expected - I was thinking it would be more along the lines of an inflationary increase with further annual rises after that. If it does go straight back to the old £1.8m level, I'll be very happy as it will give me plenty of headroom to work with...Pat38493 said:BBC are running their main headline this morning on Today program R4 with the 60K figure and also quoting a 1.8m figure for LTA.
Of course, such a large jump will come with cries of 'foul' from people that have recently crystallised at/around LTA and won't get any benefit because of how it's worked out on a percentage basis.
2 -
Anyone disadvantaged by the 1M or 1.073M LTA either fully or partially could get an extra LTA bolt on allowed of an amount or a %marlot said:
I doubt any change will help anyone who retired at 100% of the current LTA (£1.073M). Even if the LTA rises to £1.5M, they'll likely be trapped by the old level. Hard to see an easy way to entice them back into work.RogerPensionGuy said:Press releases now appearing more confident of sensible increase to various pension rules,, hopefully it will include some mechanism for people unfairly caught out by random down shifting of the LTA to get their pension pots and plans back in order.
If these changes are indeed correct, it will certainly increase people happier to remain or going back in to the working/employment arena.
https://www.independent.co.uk/money/hunt-considering-pension-changes-in-the-budget-in-drive-to-bolster-workforce-b2300178.html
A big increase in LTA and AA may well reduce pressure on medics. Because the 2015 NHS scheme raises pensions by CPI+1.5% each year, the AA bills can be huge.
It's easily possible and I hope it occurs, the 1M and 1.073M figures were/are bonkers, IIRC it was 1.8M in 2012.1 -
I agree, if the changes don't incorporate a 'bolt on' for those already at 100% LTA then it defects the object of trying to get the likes of senior doctors etc, back into the work place.RogerPensionGuy pensions by CPI+1.5% each year, the AA bills can be huge.Anyone disadvantaged by the 1M or 1.073M LTA either fully or partially could get an extra LTA bolt on allowed of an amount or a %
It's easily possible and I hope it occurs, the 1M and 1.073M figures were/are bonkers, IIRC it was 1.8M in 2012.
0 -
You just know that the opposition will have a field day with those increases.
"helping the rich" etc etc.
I wonder...IF they did win next time out, will they REVERSE these changes, or suddenly go very quiet on them.How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)2 -
Unless something changes today looks like Lta Will be 1.8m and AA of 60k.
Not convinced the AA increase is a good idea but the Lta certainty helps as I had envisaged exceeding this.2 -
I doubt either of these will tempt many early retirees back to work.1
-
Well... they would be correct in saying that.Sea_Shell said:You just know that the opposition will have a field day with those increases.
"helping the rich" etc etc.
I wonder...IF they did win next time out, will they REVERSE these changes, or suddenly go very quiet on them.
Wonder what help there will be that benefits everyone.
0 -
I suspect they'll make the most of these changes helping the rich but if pushed will say they won't reverse then as people need certainty in their pension planning. Win / win for them really!Sea_Shell said:You just know that the opposition will have a field day with those increases.
"helping the rich" etc etc.
I wonder...IF they did win next time out, will they REVERSE these changes, or suddenly go very quiet on them.0 -
Yup you can hear the melody of the words now, "...Jade single mother with 3 disabled children can't even afford shoe leather to walk to the foodbank whilst the rich get £1.8 million tax free and can pass that on to their kids" etc etcSea_Shell said:You just know that the opposition will have a field day with those increases.
"helping the rich" etc etc.
I wonder...IF they did win next time out, will they REVERSE these changes, or suddenly go very quiet on them.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
