EXTENDED: You've got another week to add your travel & holiday deals questions for expert MSE Oli as part of the latest Ask An Expert event.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Thank you for your understanding.

Two leaseholds, two freeholds

Just wondering if anyone has come across this before. We were looking to buy a first floor flat (1A) which was advertised as share of freehold with the ground floor flat (1B) below it. But when our solicitor saw the title documents from the Land Registry he discovered that flat 1A owns the freehold to 1B and flat 1B owns the freehold to 1A. I.e. there are two freeholds and each leaseholder owns the "others" freehold. Our solicitor says it should not have been possible to register with two freeholds (and yet it clearly happened and the seller's solicitor apparently does not see anything wrong with it). So, anyone come across this before? Either way, I find it very odd that one flat owns the freehold to the other. 

Replies

  • edited 22 February at 2:36PM
    eddddyeddddy Forumite
    15K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 22 February at 2:36PM
    Matty1966 said:

    Our solicitor says it should not have been possible to register with two freeholds (and yet it clearly happened and the seller's solicitor apparently does not see anything wrong with it)

     Either way, I find it very odd that one flat owns the freehold to the other. 

    You (and your solicitor) should google 'Tyneside Lease' and/or 'Criss-Cross Lease' and/or 'Reverse Freehold'.

    They're fairly unusual. It might be better to find a different solicitor who is familiar with this type of lease.

    Where in the country are you, and where in the country is your solicitor?

    It's sometimes better to use a local solicitor, who is familiar with 'unusual' types of local property.


  • Matty1966Matty1966 Forumite
    2 Posts
    First Post
    Newbie
    Wow, fascinating - thanks! 
  • propertyrentalpropertyrental Forumite
    1.2K Posts
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    As edddy says, "should not have been possible to register with two freeholds" is very poor legal advice.

    Yes, it's unusual and can present difficulties eg on shared maintenance, but it is relatively common in certain specific areas of the country.
  • kirtondmkirtondm Forumite
    436 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    I used to own one of these. From the convencying point of view you do not 'share the freehold'. Your freeholder is the flat above / below. In practical terms it is normally easier to deal with than a remote freeholder. Need to check the provisions for repair / insurance etc. Mine had 999 year lease and £1 ground rent. When you buy you buy the freehold for the other flat so their is a quid pro quo about lease extensions and ground rent!
  • NameUnavailableNameUnavailable Forumite
    2.5K Posts
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    If you own the freehold you can't extend your own lease so it is one way to get around that problem, not sure if there are other reasons for it. How long is the lease?
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Energy Price Cap change

Martin Lewis on what it means for you

MSE News

Best £1 you've ever spent?

Share your most impressive bargains

MSE Forum