We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Not taking lump sum..
Comments
-
and pay higher rate tax, and then also get a state pension taxed at 40%. Better to minimise HRT if you can.Stubod said:If you don't really need a cash lump sum and health is not an issue, I would always recommend not taking it. Better to have a higher monthly income IMHO?Mortgage free
Vocational freedom has arrived0 -
sheslookinhot said:
and pay higher rate tax, and then also get a state pension taxed at 40%. Better to minimise HRT if you can.Stubod said:If you don't really need a cash lump sum and health is not an issue, I would always recommend not taking it. Better to have a higher monthly income IMHO?
..yes, but this does not apply if you only have an £8k pension as per the OP??
.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."2 -
I posted a similar question recently as my USS DB pension gives a TFLS as the default option but I don’t need it. One suggestion made to me was to take the TFLS and buy an annuity with it. Might be worth you looking into this as an option?0
-
That will depend very much on your personal pension, DB schemes can vary massively over what escalations they payBrie said:An IFA I talked to claimed that there was more to be made by investing the lump sum then what I might get over the life of the pension if I didn't take it. Not sure how valid that is. The only obvious value of a lump to me was to tidy up my finances in general and to get me through to my state pension comfortably.0 -
I had been paying into the LGPS for a long time, but due to transferring from one scheme to another I didn't have an automatic lump sum. I could have commuted some of my pension to get one, but at 12:1 I didn't think the rate was very good.
With a 10.1% increase on my pension from April next year I certainly don't think I made the wrong choice.
We have a cash buffer, from relocating, so can afford one-off big expenditure should we so choose.3 -
Thanks everybody.
Good to get different viewpoints.
My nhs pension is 8k approx and my state pension is 9.5k... so I feel I should just go with that and use my private pension as a buffer when I (hopefully, eventually) need it.
I really appreciate your input.
My thanks again.3 -
I took my Civil Service pension with the maximum lump sum (I know a lot will frown upon that), but it meant I was able to retire early at 58, I still get a decent CPI linked pension of about £18k per year plus have a very tidy sum currently earning me about £500 per month in interest (yes i know rates won't be this high for remainder of my life). Plus, I thought do I need the extra monthly income in my latter years as by then I will also be getting the state pension and will probably have more than I need at that time. Also, you need a Crystral ball to forecast your health and how long you will be on this planet. I calculated that I would be in deficit (lump sum v pension) if I live beyond about 74, but that doesn't account for the interest I am earning. As I said if I hadn't taken the max lump sum I would probably still be working and getting up at 5am in the morning - no thanks done that for 40+ years and had enough of it.1
-
That's a huge amount of interest, is it actually more than you would have got from the pension if you hadn't taken the lump sum?kassy64 said:I took my Civil Service pension with the maximum lump sum (I know a lot will frown upon that), but it meant I was able to retire early at 58, I still get a decent CPI linked pension of about £18k per year plus have a very tidy sum currently earning me about £500 per month in interest0 -
Definitely yes, but obviously it assumes I don’t touch or use any of the lump sum, plus I understand that these relatively high interest rates won’t last forever. When I retired my aim was to get about £200 interest per month but since rates have shot up. I have a few fixed rate accounts and ISAs set up earning 3.5 to 4.5%. Obviously I will have to pay tax at some point but have put some in my wife’s name to limit the tax hit.Qyburn said:
That's a huge amount of interest, is it actually more than you would have got from the pension if you hadn't taken the lump sum?kassy64 said:I took my Civil Service pension with the maximum lump sum (I know a lot will frown upon that), but it meant I was able to retire early at 58, I still get a decent CPI linked pension of about £18k per year plus have a very tidy sum currently earning me about £500 per month in interest0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards