We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Data Protection

Thoughts please,

A couple of years ago I decided I no longer wanted to retain my financial advisor on an ongoing basis. I communicated this to both the financial advisor and my pension company and both acknowledged receipt of the instruction.

Recently I received a communication from the financial advisor, and in that communication, they quoted the value of my pension fund the day before they sent the communication. Alarm bells started to ring, because as far as I was concerned, they should no longer have access to that account. I asked the pension company to investigate how this was possible. They responded, accepting that they failed to revoke the financial advisor's access. They have offered compensation at £150.00 and said that if I did not want to accept the compensation, I could refer the matter to the FOS/FCA.

What’s your thoughts please. Is their offer of compensation proportionate to them not protecting my private and personal data, or should I raise a complaint with the FOS/FCA.

I’m still awaiting a response from the financial advisor but not sure what expect from them. They accessed my private and personal data, knowing they no longer represented me.


TIA


Comments

  • Brie
    Brie Posts: 16,678 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You communicated to both the advisor AND the pension company and neither of them took any notice.  I'd be wanting compensation from both and then also referring it on for further investigation.
    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe, Old Style Money Saving and Pensions boards.  If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.

    Click on this link for a Statement of Accounts that can be posted on the DebtFree Wannabe board:  https://lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.php

    Check your state pension on: Check your State Pension forecast - GOV.UK

    "Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.”  Nellie McClung
    ⭐️🏅😇🏅🏅🏅🏅
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 40,444 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    £150 seems like a reasonable offer in the circumstances - it's obviously an administrative error but one that doesn't involve any loss or even inconvenience for you.

    You'd have the right to go to FOS (not FCA) if you felt inclined not to accept, but it would take many months to go through their process and it's far from certain that they'd view the matter any differently.  Likewise you could complain to the ICO, although they wouldn't have any role in determining compensation.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,223 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    A couple of years ago I decided I no longer wanted to retain my financial advisor on an ongoing basis. I communicated this to both the financial advisor and my pension company and both acknowledged receipt of the instruction.
    That is a vague instruction.

    For example, it doesn't say you do not wish the financial adviser to have any access anymore.  It just says you don't want to retain them on an ongoing basis.     So, that could be interpreted as an instruction to turn off the ongoing remuneration.  

    What’s your thoughts please. Is their offer of compensation proportionate to them not protecting my private and personal data, or should I raise a complaint with the FOS/FCA.
    You are lucky to get £150 as the instruction is vague.  Indeed, it is more likely it is a simple goodwill gesture rather than an admittance of fault.

    you have suffered no loss and had no distress and your instruction was unclear.   So, £150 is a win.

    I’m still awaiting a response from the financial advisor but not sure what expect from them. They accessed my private and personal data, knowing they no longer represented me.

    I would not expect a penny from the adviser, and there is no reason to. Moving from an ongoing client to transactional does not require the adviser firm to remove themselves as agent on any policies unless you specifically state as much.   The only requirement is that the ongoing fee ceased.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    What damage have you suffered as a result of the breach? In what way has it caused you distress or embarrassment? 

    Assuming the answer is none across the board then £150 sounds a generous offer.
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 15,870 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Take the £150 and next time ensure your instructions are completely clear. As others have said, from your post it sounds as if you were far from clear.
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • Gsea
    Gsea Posts: 51 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts

    Hi all,


    Thanks for your opinions. I will indeed accept the offer.

    Perhaps my instructions were vague, and I presumed revoking access was an obvious action. The pension company said the changes required to complete the instruction were not fully actioned by them and apologise for the level of service in this case.

     

     Thanks guys!



  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,223 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Perhaps my instructions were vague, and I presumed revoking access was an obvious action.
    Advisers work on either a transactional basis (i.e. one off or periodic ad-hoc) or ongoing basis.    

    Where an adviser works on transactional, they will give the advice and carry out the transaction but the policy will still remain on their agency.    And by ongoing, they get paid a fee to provide regular ongoing advice.

    So, terminology was probably at play here.   Your reference to wanting to end the ongoing service would have seen the adviser log onto the platform and set the remuneration to zero and end any diary tasks and remove any integrations they have with the software they use to provide ongoing advice.  An adviser will not delete your data. That will be held for as long as the company exists and that is allowed within the data protection act.    And an adviser cannot remove themselves from a policy. Only the provider can.

    The platform/provider can also turn off the ongoing at their end.  So, if the adviser got their first, they would see it was zero and leave it at that.   If they beat the adviser, then they would set it to zero and leave it at that.

    Unless you used words similar to please remove the adviser from my pension or revoke adviser access, they wouldn't do it.

     The pension company said the changes required to complete the instruction were not fully actioned by them and apologise for the level of service in this case.
    To deal with a complaint costs money for big players.   The quicker they can end the complaint, the cheaper it is and that means they often pay small amounts on cases of no wrongdoing because it is cheaper.       In this case, they acknowledge what you have said, apologise, deal with it and give you a £150 and move onto the next one.  Rather than spend the next 6-24 months arguing the case.  If you are still with that provider, there is even more of an incentive to keep you as a customer.   If you were no longer a customer, they may not have been as generous.

     Thanks guys!
    Enjoy the £150.



    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Gsea
    Gsea Posts: 51 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    Thank you dunstonh.

    Every days a school day :)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.