We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply

Pension tax relief

1234568»

Comments

  • foofi22
    foofi22 Posts: 2,215 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    I've had a recent pay rise that has met I can 'benefit' from the relief.  Therefore there is a high probability it will be removed, sorry for ruining it for everyone
  • MK62
    MK62 Posts: 1,851 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    EdSwippet said:
    MK62 said:
    kinger101 said:
    Broadly - I think 6.25% benefit is insufficient to encourage saving within an pension.
    ......but what would HR taxpayers do with the money they then no longer save into a pension?
    Venture Capital Trusts (VCTs)?
    Yes, that's an option....if the risks are palatable of course.......and providing the 30% tax relief isn't reduced as part of any tax relief cost saving measures.......and I suspect it would be if VCT (and similar) investing ramped up several orders of magnitude as a result of any changes to pension tax relief........but it's all speculation.......in all likelihood Mr Sunak and Mr Hunt will kick this can down the road again.
  • Mick70
    Mick70 Posts: 777 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    MK62 said:
    kinger101 said:

    Broadly - I think 6.25% benefit is insufficient to encourage saving within an pension.
    ......but what would HR taxpayers do with the money they then no longer save into a pension?

    Lot of my colleagues are now investing in holiday lets and seem to be plenty loopholes to minimise tax 
  • MK62
    MK62 Posts: 1,851 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    kuratowski said:
    MK62 said:
    ......but what would HR taxpayers do with the money they then no longer save into a pension?
    Save/invest it somewhere they can access it without waiting for decades.  The 6.25% may not be sufficient inducement to make the money inaccessible for a long time.
    Yes, that's certainly a possibility, but I'm not sure why government would be particularly concerned about this tbh ....
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 30,783 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    MK62 said:
    kinger101 said:

    Broadly - I think 6.25% benefit is insufficient to encourage saving within an pension.
    ......but what would HR taxpayers do with the money they then no longer save into a pension?

    Do not forget that many HR taxpayers do not take real advantage of pension tax relief even now, or are even aware of it, or do not claim it back. So not sure what % of the population would be that aggrieved if it was removed.
    If 15% of those paying tax, pay some tax at HR ( last figure I heard) then some will be paying very little, some will be making only small pension contributions , so maybe half will be affected significantly . Then lots of people do not pay any tax or are not employed etc . So although it is a subject dear to the heart of this forum, maybe < 5% of the population would be that bothered ?
  • MK62
    MK62 Posts: 1,851 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    MK62 said:
    kinger101 said:

    Broadly - I think 6.25% benefit is insufficient to encourage saving within an pension.
    ......but what would HR taxpayers do with the money they then no longer save into a pension?

    Do not forget that many HR taxpayers do not take real advantage of pension tax relief even now, or are even aware of it, or do not claim it back. So not sure what % of the population would be that aggrieved if it was removed.
    If 15% of those paying tax, pay some tax at HR ( last figure I heard) then some will be paying very little, some will be making only small pension contributions , so maybe half will be affected significantly . Then lots of people do not pay any tax or are not employed etc . So although it is a subject dear to the heart of this forum, maybe < 5% of the population would be that bothered ?
    That's still about 1.6M people though (ie 5% of taxpayers, not 5% of the whole population).......and I suspect a significant chunk would normally be Conservative voters. Then again, they could do it and basically dare a Labour or Labour/Lib Dem government to then undo it........or, and possibly more likely if they have privately given up on winning the next election, wait 2 years and shove the problem onto the new incoming government.......
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 30,783 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    MK62 said:
    MK62 said:
    kinger101 said:

    Broadly - I think 6.25% benefit is insufficient to encourage saving within an pension.
    ......but what would HR taxpayers do with the money they then no longer save into a pension?

    Do not forget that many HR taxpayers do not take real advantage of pension tax relief even now, or are even aware of it, or do not claim it back. So not sure what % of the population would be that aggrieved if it was removed.
    If 15% of those paying tax, pay some tax at HR ( last figure I heard) then some will be paying very little, some will be making only small pension contributions , so maybe half will be affected significantly . Then lots of people do not pay any tax or are not employed etc . So although it is a subject dear to the heart of this forum, maybe < 5% of the population would be that bothered ?
    That's still about 1.6M people though (ie 5% of taxpayers, not 5% of the whole population).......and I suspect a significant chunk would normally be Conservative voters. Then again, they could do it and basically dare a Labour or Labour/Lib Dem government to then undo it........or, and possibly more likely if they have privately given up on winning the next election, wait 2 years and shove the problem onto the new incoming government.......
    Also I suppose some people get agitated about taxes, they do not even pay, like inheritance tax. Its unpopularity seems to extend well beyond people who pay it, or may ever pay it. 
  • resk
    resk Posts: 71 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10 Posts
    Tax relief miraculously survives for another wee while.  Phew!  
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 30,783 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    resk said:
    Tax relief miraculously survives for another wee while.  Phew!  
    No mention of salary sacrifice either .

    Maybe a review will be announced at some point.
  • Mick70
    Mick70 Posts: 777 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    resk said:
    Tax relief miraculously survives for another wee while.  Phew!  
    No mention of salary sacrifice either .

    Maybe a review will be announced at some point.
    The two would have to go hand in hand , maybe an IT Admin nightmare and a potential backlash for how much they would gain ?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.