We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Retirement - planning assumptions
Comments
-
I have scenarios with:
Permanent drop of 40% in savings/investments
State pension becoming means tested
Care home fees
1 -
Don't fixate on your joint incomes - you also need a plan to ensure that the one left behind will be ok on one income.Plasticman said:@bluenose1 - that was a helpful tool. Real shame that it doesn't allow you to enter details as a couple though.2 -
Lots of great points but....
Sequence of return risk!
This is the make or break for retirement portfolios.
There are plenty of modeling sites out there (I like FIcalc).
Retirement pots don't go down it a linear fashion.
A pot big enough to survive sequence of return risk is a much larger pot than many people factor in and has sent more than the odd person back to the drawing board.
Or, have a chuffing great DB pension and never worry about SOR.4 -
Still desirable to have a joint plan. Spending won't necessarily be equally apportioned.Silvertabby said:
Don't fixate on your joint incomes - you also need a plan to ensure that the one left behind will be ok on one income.Plasticman said:@bluenose1 - that was a helpful tool. Real shame that it doesn't allow you to enter details as a couple though.1 -
Yes, we have a joint plan but with figures for individual incomes too.Silvertabby said:
Don't fixate on your joint incomes - you also need a plan to ensure that the one left behind will be ok on one income.Plasticman said:@bluenose1 - that was a helpful tool. Real shame that it doesn't allow you to enter details as a couple though.1 -
Both you and Marlot make very good points. Have either of you adjusted your plans?billy2shots said:Lots of great points but....
Sequence of return risk!
This is the make or break for retirement portfolios.
There are plenty of modeling sites out there (I like FIcalc).
Retirement pots don't go down it a linear fashion.
A pot big enough to survive sequence of return risk is a much larger pot than many people factor in and has sent more than the odd person back to the drawing board.
Or, have a chuffing great DB pension and never worry about SOR.
My thinking was that if the only reason you ‘need’ a bigger pot is to cope with SOR then you use a fixed term annuity (taking the inflation hit which is hopefully much less than say your worst case 40% drop).SOR is more important for early retirees and those whose income requirements after SPA are higher.
To return to the original question I would look at how much flexibility I had on the expenditure side of the equation.1 -
I agree SORR is a concern….it has prompted me to pause drawdown and use cash for the time being.
One area I feel that is almost impossible to cater for are care home costs.
Most people don’t use them, and of those that do, most are in for less than 26 months.
Making allowances for being one of the outliers that might have many years of care would mean working for far, far too many years for me to contemplate 🤷♂️Plan for tomorrow, enjoy today!1 -
DT2001 said:
Both you and Marlot make very good points. Have either of you adjusted your plans?billy2shots said:Lots of great points but....
Sequence of return risk!
This is the make or break for retirement portfolios.
There are plenty of modeling sites out there (I like FIcalc).
Retirement pots don't go down it a linear fashion.
A pot big enough to survive sequence of return risk is a much larger pot than many people factor in and has sent more than the odd person back to the drawing board.
Or, have a chuffing great DB pension and never worry about SOR.
My thinking was that if the only reason you ‘need’ a bigger pot is to cope with SOR then you use a fixed term annuity (taking the inflation hit which is hopefully much less than say your worst case 40% drop).SOR is more important for early retirees and those whose income requirements after SPA are higher.
To return to the original question I would look at how much flexibility I had on the expenditure side of the equation.
I am 40 so still far from retirement, however I plan to FIRE in the next couple of years.
No changes to my plans. I will look to drawdown from ISA, GIA, SIPP, LISA at a combined rate of 3% of the total pot each year.
If 3% of my total pot is not enough for for my needs due to inflation (£32,500) then I will have to hold off FIREing.
I will keep 3 years worth of essential living expenses (£20k at present) to use incase of a market crash.
I do plan on paid employment in the future, part time low paid in something I enjoy (on call firefighter/ army reserves) but I don't count this potential money.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

