We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Remortgage: Settling Debts - Solicitor requirements

LawAbiding
Posts: 295 Forumite

Hi,
We are going through a remortgage at the moment and have decided to settle some debts and free some equity for house renovations.
The mortgage lender have put the special conditions in the offer that the debts outlined must be settled by the legal advisor.
The solicitor has stated that he must receive the settlement letters from the creditors directly, and I cannot request the settlement letters and pass these onto him.
However, a couple of the creditors are refusing to deal with any 3rd party, even after I provided a letter of authority to the creditor.
Now the mortgage offer does specifically state "The legal adviser must ensure that the following debt is repaid on or prior to completion" for each condition for each debt. Each debt is listed with a account number
But it doesnt say, that the Solicitor must correspond with the creditor directly.
I am being naive to think, why can't they just accept the letters I can obtain within hours, rather then taking weeks by post?
This has been going on for approx 4-5 weeks now, back and forth.
Any feedback welcomed!
We are going through a remortgage at the moment and have decided to settle some debts and free some equity for house renovations.
The mortgage lender have put the special conditions in the offer that the debts outlined must be settled by the legal advisor.
The solicitor has stated that he must receive the settlement letters from the creditors directly, and I cannot request the settlement letters and pass these onto him.
However, a couple of the creditors are refusing to deal with any 3rd party, even after I provided a letter of authority to the creditor.
Now the mortgage offer does specifically state "The legal adviser must ensure that the following debt is repaid on or prior to completion" for each condition for each debt. Each debt is listed with a account number
But it doesnt say, that the Solicitor must correspond with the creditor directly.
I am being naive to think, why can't they just accept the letters I can obtain within hours, rather then taking weeks by post?
This has been going on for approx 4-5 weeks now, back and forth.
Any feedback welcomed!
0
Comments
-
Probably not unreasonable that the solicitor gets some sort of direct confirmation from the lenders of the balance required - if these had been secured loans then that's what would happen. Otherwise you could be passing on something you've doctored, the loans aren't repaid in full, and the lender sues the solicitors.
I suppose you could try asking the new lender if they are actually more relaxed than the solicitor is, and can instruct them accordingly?1 -
That doesn't make sense to me. I've had the same condition a few years ago when I was consolidating debt on to a remortgage. What the solicitor did was hold back the amount needed to pay off the debt and make the payments themselves using the bank details and references given by the credit card providers. They charged me £100-150 or so to do this.1
-
user1977 said:Probably not unreasonable that the solicitor gets some sort of direct confirmation from the lenders of the balance required - if these had been secured loans then that's what would happen. Otherwise you could be passing on something you've doctored, the loans aren't repaid in full, and the lender sues the solicitors.
I suppose you could try asking the new lender if they are actually more relaxed than the solicitor is, and can instruct them accordingly?0 -
simon_or said:That doesn't make sense to me. I've had the same condition a few years ago when I was consolidating debt on to a remortgage. What the solicitor did was hold back the amount needed to pay off the debt and make the payments themselves using the bank details and references given by the credit card providers. They charged me £100-150 or so to do this.
The credit cards are Aqua, Fluid and Marbles, all come under NewDay, and all of them have the same stance.1 -
LawAbiding said:simon_or said:That doesn't make sense to me. I've had the same condition a few years ago when I was consolidating debt on to a remortgage. What the solicitor did was hold back the amount needed to pay off the debt and make the payments themselves using the bank details and references given by the credit card providers. They charged me £100-150 or so to do this.
The credit cards are Aqua, Fluid and Marbles, all come under NewDay, and all of them have the same stance.I don't know about the others but Aqua definitely has their bank details and instructions for payment on their website. The 16 digit reference to be used is printed on your credit card statement, hopefully you have a hard copy to hand if the solicitor won't take a pdf.Surely the above is enough for your solicitor to make the payment using information straight from the horse's mouth.0 -
simon_or said:LawAbiding said:simon_or said:That doesn't make sense to me. I've had the same condition a few years ago when I was consolidating debt on to a remortgage. What the solicitor did was hold back the amount needed to pay off the debt and make the payments themselves using the bank details and references given by the credit card providers. They charged me £100-150 or so to do this.
The credit cards are Aqua, Fluid and Marbles, all come under NewDay, and all of them have the same stance.I don't know about the others but Aqua definitely has their bank details and instructions for payment on their website. The 16 digit reference to be used is printed on your credit card statement, hopefully you have a hard copy to hand if the solicitor won't take a pdf.Surely the above is enough for your solicitor to make the payment using information straight from the horse's mouth.
I have emailed the solicitor today and questioned it all, the mortgage offer does say the legal must ensure, however it also makes it clear that myself and my wife is responsibile to provide evidence if the conditions have been met when/if requested by the lender.
If the solicitor feels he is liable etc, then I will be suggesting that document is put in place that both me and my wife sign moving that laibility away from him over to us.0 -
LawAbiding said:simon_or said:LawAbiding said:simon_or said:That doesn't make sense to me. I've had the same condition a few years ago when I was consolidating debt on to a remortgage. What the solicitor did was hold back the amount needed to pay off the debt and make the payments themselves using the bank details and references given by the credit card providers. They charged me £100-150 or so to do this.
The credit cards are Aqua, Fluid and Marbles, all come under NewDay, and all of them have the same stance.I don't know about the others but Aqua definitely has their bank details and instructions for payment on their website. The 16 digit reference to be used is printed on your credit card statement, hopefully you have a hard copy to hand if the solicitor won't take a pdf.Surely the above is enough for your solicitor to make the payment using information straight from the horse's mouth.0 -
OP, if you have a good hands-on broker, perhaps it's worth asking them to speak to the solicitor, lender and understand what can be done to resolve this impasse which (to my mind) seems fairly surmountable if the solicitor applied a bit of common sense.Strictly speaking, it's not usually a broker's job but mine has been incredibly helpful in the past when issues cropped up at conveyancing.1
-
simon_or said:OP, if you have a good hands-on broker, perhaps it's worth asking them to speak to the solicitor, lender and understand what can be done to resolve this impasse which (to my mind) seems fairly surmountable if the solicitor applied a bit of common sense.Strictly speaking, it's not usually a broker's job but mine has been incredibly helpful in the past when issues cropped up at conveyancing.
Solicitor has come back saying "better", they deal with the lenders directly, build a relationship and to manage any disputes with settlement.
I have gone back stating, you have said better, this means to me its not a requirement if so, then I am happy to take the liability as I have no reason to commit fraud.
Hes responded that he's taken my comments and will respond to me accordingly tomorrow.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards