We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
FCA regulation
potatoefeet66
Posts: 238 Forumite
Dear all. I have been advised to ask advice from an independent mortgage expert, following the FCA request for evidence of a breach in regulation. They have advised me that my evidence has now been passed to their team who regulate this bank.
A Kfi was issued for a reduction £138k satisfying bank LTV criteria, however it has now become clear that the application under the kfi ref was for an increased figure £142131.00, greater than 1% stated in kfi, at any rate out side of existing contractual LTV criteria.
It was not level of lending agreed in kfi and was not level of lending required.
Application was formally declined in letter stating failure on credit scoring. Bank control shows good score normal case.
So given FCA request I’m wondering if any regulatory rules have been breached.
0
Comments
-
@potatoefeet66 Would you mind giving a bit of background? It's not clear to me what the issue is and where the FCA comes in?
Are you saying that the illustration you were sent indicated a loan amount of £138k but the application went in for £142k? I'm not sure what you mean by "contractual LTV criteria".I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
0 -
A mortgage was already existing with LTV criteria of 60-40%. Lender issued kfi at point of application of 138k however an application was submitted and declined for a higher figure outside of bank criteria.K_S said:@potatoefeet66 Would you mind giving a bit of background? It's not clear to me what the issue is and where the FCA comes in?
Are you saying that the illustration you were sent indicated a loan amount of £138k but the application went in for £142k? I'm not sure what you mean by "contractual LTV criteria".I asked the FCA about this and hence their request and acknowledgment they have passed documents supporting a breach to their team who regulate lender.0 -
Who applied for the higher amount?0
-
Kfi was not for illustration purposes it was figure of 138k a reduction to outstanding balance agreed by lender to meet LTV criteria.potatoefeet66 said:
A mortgage was already existing with LTV criteria of 60-40%. Lender issued kfi at point of application of 138k however an application was submitted and declined for a higher figure outside of bank criteria.K_S said:@potatoefeet66 Would you mind giving a bit of background? It's not clear to me what the issue is and where the FCA comes in?
Are you saying that the illustration you were sent indicated a loan amount of £138k but the application went in for £142k? I'm not sure what you mean by "contractual LTV criteria".I asked the FCA about this and hence their request and acknowledgment they have passed documents supporting a breach to their team who regulate lender.Lender submitted application with higher figure outside of bank criteria.0 -
The lenders advisorRO1993 said:Who applied for the higher amount?0 -
I don’t think I follow this at all.potatoefeet66 said:
The lenders advisorRO1993 said:Who applied for the higher amount?
So if a mortgage exists, are you remortgaging?
Are you using a broker? Maybe you could bullet point the steps to help understand0 -
A thorough read of the OP's previous threads on what appears to be the same mortgage (from 2005) will get you up to speed.RO1993 said:
I don’t think I follow this at all.potatoefeet66 said:
The lenders advisorRO1993 said:Who applied for the higher amount?
So if a mortgage exists, are you remortgaging?
Are you using a broker? Maybe you could bullet point the steps to help understand
1 -
Your not alone!RO1993 said:I don’t think I follow this at all.
I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
This was a miss use of a process. That lender failed to disclose or correct.Unfair treatment and not in anyway in the customers interest.That’s in the rules.0
-
they also dont have to lendDon't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
