We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Self employed to employed pension
mountaindreams
Posts: 47 Forumite
I was self employed for about 10 years and for some of that time was paying into a SIPP. I have recently started part time employment and have enrolled in the pension scheme putting in 7% of my salary so I get the maximum amount the company will put in of 6.5%.
If I want to pay more into a pension is it better to pay it into the workplace one rather than the SIPP? Would both have approx the same tax advantage but the workplace one also save NI?
If I want to pay more into a pension is it better to pay it into the workplace one rather than the SIPP? Would both have approx the same tax advantage but the workplace one also save NI?
0
Comments
-
Which method is being used to make the workplace contributions?
It sounds like you are putting in 7% so there won't be any NI saving.
The usual methods are relief at source or net pay.
But it could be salary sacrifice however you don't pay anything with that.
0 -
It’s salary sacrifice. Yes, I put
in 7% the company 6.5%0 -
I presume It makes sense to pay the 7% into the company pension so I get the 6.5%.But if I decided I wanted to put some extra into a pension there wouldn’t be any advantage putting it in the work one? And with the work one I’d be limited what funds they invest in so if I wanted to choose I’d be better using my SIPP?0
-
If it's salary sacrifice you put zero in and your employer puts 13.5% in.mountaindreams said:It’s salary sacrifice. Yes, I put
in 7% the company 6.5%
If you check your pension account you will see there is no pension tax relief being added.
But you are avoiding paying tax and NI on the amount you have agreed to sacrifice.
Because of the NI saving its usually the best way to get money into your pension. Low earners can be better with "relief at source" which is where the pension company add basic rate tax relief to your contribution.
If you are still paying tax and NI after the 6.5% you currently sacrifice then additional salary sacrifice is likely to be the most tax and NI efficient option for additional contributions.0 -
Thanks for the explanation. It’s only just being set up so I don’t have the details for the pension account yet but will check it out when I do.
0 -
For the large majority, having limited funds to invest in is actually a benefit. In fact the large majority of people in workplace pensions never choose any fund, and are in the default fund. Many ( most ?) would not even know what a fund is, or how to choose one.mountaindreams said:I presume It makes sense to pay the 7% into the company pension so I get the 6.5%.But if I decided I wanted to put some extra into a pension there wouldn’t be any advantage putting it in the work one? And with the work one I’d be limited what funds they invest in so if I wanted to choose I’d be better using my SIPP?
A SIPP is only potentially better if you have a better understanding of investing and if it is cheaper ( that is for sure not always the case and some workplace pensions have low charges )
Also by increasing your workplace contributions you will have the NI gain, which you will not have by contributing to your SIPP.
In some cases it is possible to make partial transfers out of a workplace pension, if you really think the SIPP is a better option.0 -
check how much each costs to run.
If you have a SIPP you are paying a % on the total value in there every year. So the more that's in it the more you pay to the company holding the funds. Likely you are not paying anything for holding funds as many OPS the employer foots this. If so putting ££ in to the work pension would be a better option. But best to check in case there is a charge.I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe, Old Style Money Saving and Pensions boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
Click on this link for a Statement of Accounts that can be posted on the DebtFree Wannabe board: https://lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.php
Check your state pension on: Check your State Pension forecast - GOV.UK
"Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.” Nellie McClung
⭐️🏅😇🏅🏅🏅🏅0 -
These days it's unlikely to be an occupational DC arrangement - more likely to be a group personal pension. Even occupational DC schemes normally have fund charges payable by members (the employer typically pays admin costs such as running the trustee board, producing communications etc).Brie said:check how much each costs to run.
If you have a SIPP you are paying a % on the total value in there every year. So the more that's in it the more you pay to the company holding the funds. Likely you are not paying anything for holding funds as many OPS the employer foots this. If so putting ££ in to the work pension would be a better option. But best to check in case there is a charge.Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!0 -
Plus ( hopefully) the employer has negotiated low fund/platform charges on behalf of the employees. It seems some large employers/good negotiators can get the total cost down as low as 0.25% as long as standard funds are used.Marcon said:
These days it's unlikely to be an occupational DC arrangement - more likely to be a group personal pension. Even occupational DC schemes normally have fund charges payable by members (the employer typically pays admin costs such as running the trustee board, producing communications etc).Brie said:check how much each costs to run.
If you have a SIPP you are paying a % on the total value in there every year. So the more that's in it the more you pay to the company holding the funds. Likely you are not paying anything for holding funds as many OPS the employer foots this. If so putting ££ in to the work pension would be a better option. But best to check in case there is a charge.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
