We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Returns and inflation forecasting

13»

Comments

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 29,129 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Also downsizing is part of our strategy so that will give us flexibility if things don't turn out as well as planned. 
    Might be worth a read .

    Downsizing: why the dream rarely matches reality (fidelity.co.uk)


  • anonmoose
    anonmoose Posts: 229 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary
    Thanks Albemarle I read it but in our case it isn't relevant as we have land and it takes a massive amount of upkeep in both time and cost. We are in the higher council tax band and that is mainly due to the land with the property that we will no longer want to manage. It will be a total lifestyle change.

    But I can see if you had a nice detached there would be limited benefit to simply moving to a nice semi that's a bit cheaper.
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,090 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Sea_Shell said:
    westv said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    westv said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    Do you have to account for inflation on both sides of the spreadsheet?   Both remaining pot "worth" and projected spending?

    The money runs out very quickly doing it this way, if sustained.

    Should I only be factoring inflation on EITHER pot value or spends, rather than both?   
    Definitely one or the other. Not both

    So, if one is likely to "make cutbacks" to spending, is it better to account for inflation on the "pot" side of the equation and leave spending at a flat figure?

    Or split the difference?
    Well I just leave spending as a flat figure and reduce the total pot down by an inflation figure each year. That way I have a better idea of the future value of the pot in today's terms. 
    If I was going to make cutbacks in spending then, of course, I would reduce the spending figure if it's not keeping up with inflation.
    Thanks.   I'll have a play with the figures.

    What I'll probably to is up the spends a bit, but then leave it flat.   So allow say £18k rather than £15k.

    My Brain Hurts!!!

    Should the figures after 10 years vary wildly, depending on whether inflation is included within "erosion" of the pot, or on spends?


    I think I'll just stick my finger in the air and see which way the winds blowing!!    It'll all do what it'll do anyway.   I only have control over our asset allocation and spends...everything else will "just happen"
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • westv
    westv Posts: 6,515 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sea_Shell said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    westv said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    westv said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    Do you have to account for inflation on both sides of the spreadsheet?   Both remaining pot "worth" and projected spending?

    The money runs out very quickly doing it this way, if sustained.

    Should I only be factoring inflation on EITHER pot value or spends, rather than both?   
    Definitely one or the other. Not both

    So, if one is likely to "make cutbacks" to spending, is it better to account for inflation on the "pot" side of the equation and leave spending at a flat figure?

    Or split the difference?
    Well I just leave spending as a flat figure and reduce the total pot down by an inflation figure each year. That way I have a better idea of the future value of the pot in today's terms. 
    If I was going to make cutbacks in spending then, of course, I would reduce the spending figure if it's not keeping up with inflation.
    Thanks.   I'll have a play with the figures.

    What I'll probably to is up the spends a bit, but then leave it flat.   So allow say £18k rather than £15k.

    My Brain Hurts!!!

    Should the figures after 10 years vary wildly, depending on whether inflation is included within "erosion" of the pot, or on spends?


    I think I'll just stick my finger in the air and see which way the winds blowing!!    It'll all do what it'll do anyway.   I only have control over our asset allocation and spends...everything else will "just happen"
    Well I'm in the KISS camp. My spreadsheet has as little as is needed by me
    All it has is columns for cash pot, various DB incomes, SP and spending.
    DB/SP that will be index linked remain the same figure for each year.
    DB which won't index linked reduces by inflation.
    Spending figure remains the same on the assumption that it will stay with inflation.
    Cash pot column at the end has a reduction based on inflation rate less a guess at cash interest.
    I don't bother with any spreadsheets for the main pension SIPP.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.