We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Rules about getting a retirement quote

13»

Comments

  • westv
    westv Posts: 6,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    With a DB shouldn't the benefit figure be what you would get at the date of the statement if you were at the scheme retirement age?
    How can it go down?
  • Tony_J
    Tony_J Posts: 61 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    I guess that's what I need to know if the letter I got in 2007 was based on a prediction including future inflation. Marcon mentions prevailing inflation in the 90s.  But the letter with the higher estimate was 2007.  I have no idea how I could verify the figures.  The letter from 2007. 

    Another strange thing is in both quotes there is an option to take a lump sum and then a reduced pension.  The lump sum and reduced income are both slightly higher in the new quote compared to the letter from 2007.  Yet not going for the lump sum annual pension is £340.66 per year lower in the new quote.
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 15,694 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 13 May 2022 at 5:44PM
    Tony_J said:
    I guess that's what I need to know if the letter I got in 2007 was based on a prediction including future inflation. Marcon mentions prevailing inflation in the 90s.  But the letter with the higher estimate was 2007.  I have no idea how I could verify the figures.  The letter from 2007. 


    Inflation rates (and thus projections) change the whole time, and projections are only ever that: projections. They are not 'retirement quotes', but simply estimates - and the paperwork you will have received is likely to be littered with suitable caveats.

    Tony_J said:


    Another strange thing is in both quotes there is an option to take a lump sum and then a reduced pension.  The lump sum and reduced income are both slightly higher in the new quote compared to the letter from 2007.  Yet not going for the lump sum annual pension is £340.66 per year lower in the new quote.
    Commutation factors (the amount of tax free cash you'd get in exchange for giving up each £ of pension) also change unless the rules of the scheme set them in stone, which is rare. There is no requirement to tell members each time they change. Typically these factors would be reviewed at least every 3 years, following the conclusion of each triennial valuation of the scheme.
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.