We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
My Address has been used fraudulently for a loan
Hi
I opened some post today and found that one of the letters was not for me, but from a debt collection agency called Merligen in another person's name but using my postal and residential address. I have lived at my address for over 20 years and my husband's mother lived there before that for at least 20. No tenants or lodgers. It seems the original debt was from Elevate Credit International Limited trading as Sunny, although on their website, they say 'Sunny Finance is a loan company, not a broker, we are a direct loan lender in the UK'. Now they must have checked the details originally. How come they didn't check electoral records or bank details?
I suspect this must be a fraud. Somebody using my address.
What should I do? I don't want to have my credit rating affected by fraudulent use of my address or continue receiving aggressive post.
Any tips greatly received. Thanks.
I opened some post today and found that one of the letters was not for me, but from a debt collection agency called Merligen in another person's name but using my postal and residential address. I have lived at my address for over 20 years and my husband's mother lived there before that for at least 20. No tenants or lodgers. It seems the original debt was from Elevate Credit International Limited trading as Sunny, although on their website, they say 'Sunny Finance is a loan company, not a broker, we are a direct loan lender in the UK'. Now they must have checked the details originally. How come they didn't check electoral records or bank details?
I suspect this must be a fraud. Somebody using my address.
What should I do? I don't want to have my credit rating affected by fraudulent use of my address or continue receiving aggressive post.
Any tips greatly received. Thanks.
0
Comments
-
Just return it to sender.
Addresses don't have credit ratings so it will have no impact on you.
The lender will have made checks, but not everyone is on the ER and they can't check bank details (it would also serve no purpose) People who don't repay debts often have a habit of absconding without telling anyone and they're probably trying to track them down.6 -
Thanks for your informative reply. I will send any others back.0
-
You really should not have opened someone elses mail-1
-
Dont worry about opening someone elses mail.The actual law is: "A person commits an offence if intending to act to a person’s detriment and without reasonable excuse, he opens a postal packet which he knows or reasonably suspects has been incorrectly delivered to him"12
-
superbigal said:You really should not have opened someone elses mail13
-
Deleted_User said:Just return it to sender.
Addresses don't have credit ratings so it will have no impact on you.
The lender will have made checks, but not everyone is on the ER and they can't check bank details (it would also serve no purpose) People who don't repay debts often have a habit of absconding without telling anyone and they're probably trying to track them down.
It took some time and the help of a lawyer but they worked it out0 -
superbigal said:You really should not have opened someone elses mail
I think a letter arriving correctly at your address, but with someone else's name that has no connection with your address is a reasonable excuse. Don't you?
When my sister worked at the local sorting office, they had a 6 month back log on return to sender items. Not opening the mail will be to the persons detriment.
1 -
phillw said:superbigal said:You really should not have opened someone elses mail
I think a letter arriving correctly at your address, but with someone else's name that has no connection with your address is a reasonable excuse. Don't you?
When my sister worked at the local sorting office, they had a 6 month back log on return to sender items. Not opening the mail will be to the persons detriment.1 -
Deleted_User said:phillw said:superbigal said:You really should not have opened someone elses mail
I think a letter arriving correctly at your address, but with someone else's name that has no connection with your address is a reasonable excuse. Don't you?
When my sister worked at the local sorting office, they had a 6 month back log on return to sender items. Not opening the mail will be to the persons detri"There are not enough superlatives in the English language to describe a 'Princess Coronation' locomotive in full cry. We shall never see their like again". O S Nock0 -
poppasmurf_bewdley said:Deleted_User said:phillw said:superbigal said:You really should not have opened someone elses mail
I think a letter arriving correctly at your address, but with someone else's name that has no connection with your address is a reasonable excuse. Don't you?
When my sister worked at the local sorting office, they had a 6 month back log on return to sender items. Not opening the mail will be to the persons detri
OK I used the wrong word, you're correct, hurrah. Semantic arguments aside, the point is still valid - a bailiff could turn up to try and collect on the debt. If you watch those TV shows like Can't Pay? the person at the address has to prove goods are theirs which isn't always easy when they're convinced the address is the right place.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
![](https://us-noi.v-cdn.net/6031903/uploads/editor/vr/1lva7v6jjidq.png)
Categories
- All Categories
- 347.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.2K Spending & Discounts
- 240.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 616.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.4K Life & Family
- 253.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards