We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Employment contract.
Comments
-
I think it's [pretty normal in salaried roles, especially at management level.
You're expected to manage your own workload but have a degree of flexibility about how you do so.
If you found that the workload isn't do-able then you have the conversation about that , but I think in general, it's simply making clear that you shouldn't be clock-watching and leaving on the dot of 5 if you have thigs that need to be finished.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)1 -
Whilst I don't disagree with any of these comments, and I probably fall into the "worst offender" category of doing hours that I shouldn't be doing, I do think that the world of work and the expectations placed on people to put work first above all else is based on an outmoded concept that men work and that is their primary duty, so workplaces need make no provision for, or consideration of family responsibilities because that is "women's work" and women shouldn't be in paid employment unless they can do part-time and all the rest as well - the "pin money" thing for women. Just a few minutes after 5pm can be the difference between getting to collect your child on time, and not doing.TBagpuss said:I think it's [pretty normal in salaried roles, especially at management level.
You're expected to manage your own workload but have a degree of flexibility about how you do so.
If you found that the workload isn't do-able then you have the conversation about that , but I think in general, it's simply making clear that you shouldn't be clock-watching and leaving on the dot of 5 if you have thigs that need to be finished.
I do not subscribe to the concept that employers should elevate "family" or "personal" life over and above the work, - and there is sometimes a misplaced notion these days amongst employees that work should suit them and their wants, not the employers - at the same time the balance is often too far out on the other end of the spectrum. Some people (male and female) need to leave on the dot of 5 or whatever else is their finishing time, and doing so should no longer be seen as a "problem" or a lack of commitment. Our views of employment may have "modernised" but all too often the reality of employment is still stuck in previous eras.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards