We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Pension moved without authorisation....HELP!
Comments
-
As part of rectifying this a calculation of the value if the move hadn't happened will normally be made and extra pension contribution made to cover a loss, if there is one.
That the fund the adviser would use did better over some period than some other fund isn't particularly useful because the funds are likely to have different risk profiles. This means that just about every fund will look better or worse than dissimilar funds at some point, depending on what markets have been doing.0 -
Maybe it is....but moving the funds is certainly not 'legally allowed' in the scenario described, to my limited knowledge.....I'd use those words to spur them into ensuring they don't charge anything 😉Albermarle said:If they feel aggrieved by that, you are more than happy to raise their illegal behaviour with their Ombudsman.....Maybe 'illegal' is a bit strong , more than likely it is just a mistake /misunderstanding. These things happen .
Perhaps I'm less forgiving of mistakes as I get older (shakes fist at clouds!)
Not sure it was a "misunderstanding" since they have apologised and appear to be scrambling to rectify their error.
Plan for tomorrow, enjoy today!0 -
I would make sure that you register a formal complaint with them. There are certain regulatory implications once you do that and you can then keep going as far as ombudsman if necessary. Also means they won't try to fob you off and I would expect thy should make an initial compensation offer as part of their response to the complaint.0
-
Unfortunately mistakes like this and worse happen every day in financial services. Dealing with complaints is a whole industry in itself for many large financial firms. Once a strongly worded complaint is registered with them they will have certain deadlines to meet in terms of acknowledgement and response. From what has been described so far there should imo be grounds for compensation for the error and also a calculation should be carried out to see if the customer has suffered any financial detriment. Failure to rectify the situation quickly should increase the level of compensationcfw1994 said:
Maybe it is....but moving the funds is certainly not 'legally allowed' in the scenario described, to my limited knowledge.....I'd use those words to spur them into ensuring they don't charge anything 😉Albermarle said:If they feel aggrieved by that, you are more than happy to raise their illegal behaviour with their Ombudsman.....Maybe 'illegal' is a bit strong , more than likely it is just a mistake /misunderstanding. These things happen .
Perhaps I'm less forgiving of mistakes as I get older (shakes fist at clouds!)
Not sure it was a "misunderstanding" since they have apologised and appear to be scrambling to rectify their error.0 -
The FCA has guidance on this which says that firms should treat an expression of dissatisfaction as a complaint and I'm sure that dissatisfaction has been reported to the firm.Farside71 said:I would make sure that you register a formal complaint with them. There are certain regulatory implications once you do that and you can then keep going as far as ombudsman if necessary. Also means they won't try to fob you off and I would expect thy should make an initial compensation offer as part of their response to the complaint.0 -
That is correct - I have seen EODs being separated from complaints internally in an organisation and from what the OP says here this should definitely not be fobbed of as an EOD only. I don't think it will but I have no idea of the organisation involved here.jamesd said:
The FCA has guidance on this which says that firms should treat an expression of dissatisfaction as a complaint and I'm sure that dissatisfaction has been reported to the firm.Farside71 said:I would make sure that you register a formal complaint with them. There are certain regulatory implications once you do that and you can then keep going as far as ombudsman if necessary. Also means they won't try to fob you off and I would expect thy should make an initial compensation offer as part of their response to the complaint.
The OP needs to make sure that they have the acknowledgement of the complaint as a starting point really. Then they can be sure it's been reported to whoever in the company deals with complaints rather than just the adviser trying to 'fix' it.0 -
Unfortunately mistakes like this and worse happen every day in financial services. Dealing with complaints is a whole industry in itself for many large financial firms. Once a strongly worded complaint is registered with them they will have certain deadlines to meet in terms of acknowledgement and response.
Unless you are dealing with Mercer , who sail past all deadlines without any acknowledgement or response , complaint or otherwise !
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
