contributing to USS Investment Builder (Defined Contribution) vs. personal SIPP

sheslookinhot

Yes, I guess some of the other benefits the SG have introduced have to be paid for.

Simes122

sheslookinhot said:

Yes, I guess some of the other benefits the SG have introduced have to be paid for.

This issue, is this doesn’t.  It just impacts the economy, people’s incomes and raises no net revenue.  It pays for nothing but costs us dear.  I’d have no issues if it did.

Dazed_and_C0nfused

Simes122 said:

sheslookinhot said:

Yes, I guess some of the other benefits the SG have introduced have to be paid for.

This issue, is this doesn’t.  It just impacts the economy, people’s incomes and raises no net revenue.  It pays for nothing but costs us dear.  I’d have no issues if it did.

Isn't it helping to pay for Scottish Child payment, prescriptions and tuition fees?

Simes122

Dazed_and_C0nfused said:

Simes122 said:

sheslookinhot said:

Yes, I guess some of the other benefits the SG have introduced have to be paid for.

This issue, is this doesn’t.  It just impacts the economy, people’s incomes and raises no net revenue.  It pays for nothing but costs us dear.  I’d have no issues if it did.

Isn't it helping to pay for Scottish Child payment, prescriptions and tuition fees?

No.  It raises no additional net revenue.  It just costs middle earners more money.  And if it did, the small amount has been decimated by wastes.  Eg Ferries, failed legal cases etc.