We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Triple Lock Becomes Double Lock For 1 Year
Secret2ndAccount
Posts: 1,025 Forumite
Just announced by the pensions minister. Earnings rises expected to be around 8%, so the government has decided to ignore the earnings part of the triple lock for 1 year.
The rise in pensions will be the higher of inflation and 2.5%. That's expected to be inflation, but the number is not in yet.
The rise in pensions will be the higher of inflation and 2.5%. That's expected to be inflation, but the number is not in yet.
1
Comments
-
Yeah going to cost them too much so cutting it - BoE expecting a 4% peak with Inflation too. All gone to pot1
-
Unfortunate but the right decision in my view. This current average earnings rise of 8.8% is obviously an unforeseen anomaly.17
-
It would have been ridiculous not to have made an exception. Inflation looks like it will still give pensioners a decent rise..6
-
They got one thing right today then.
What will this cost me on my SP to be taken in 2050?0 -
Good call.Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!0
-
It is 4% more of not a rise than I will get on my salary and slightly more of not a rise than nurses and NHS staff will get. Btu we are obviously less deserving.nigelbb said:
Matching inflation is not a rise at all.pip895 said:It would have been ridiculous not to have made an exception. Inflation looks like it will still give pensioners a decent rise..I think....14 -
The pandemic is far from over in economic terms. I'd be more concerned as to how the ongoing bill is going to be funded first. Tax raising measures are a certainty.MX5huggy said:They got one thing right today then.
What will this cost me on my SP to be taken in 2050?1 -
I know people are howling about broken manifesto promises, but that was written before we knew that a global pandemic would knock the whole world on its a.r.s.e.
Of course it will have to be paid for, by the fairest means possible - and paying pensioners a wildly inflated 8.8% wouldn't have been fair.
And I've never understood why people suddenly stopped paying NI on their earnings, no matter how high, simply because they reached a certain age.
Stand by for the screaming from those who want it all on a butty - as long as someone else pays for it.16 -
Indeed, but it's a darn sight better than the pay freeze many hard working folks received. Be grateful you are at least standing still.nigelbb said:
Matching inflation is not a rise at all.pip895 said:It would have been ridiculous not to have made an exception. Inflation looks like it will still give pensioners a decent rise..
I am a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Benefits & tax credits, Heat pumps and Green & Ethical MoneySaving forums. If you need any help on those boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any post you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own & not the official line of Money Saving Expert.5
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

