📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pension Transfer with GAR.

Options
Hi,
This might be an easy question but a quick google couldn't give me the answer. My partner and i are looking to transfer a pension with a value of approx. 20k but after a phone call Royal London say that we need to take advice as she has 2 separate policies that combined total 45k. Is this information correct ?
Thanks

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,764 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 13 August 2021 at 2:03PM
    Is this information correct ?
    Yes it is.   The combined value is what matters with linked plans from the same provider as it was a way to prevent attempts to circumvent the rules by splitting plans up into smaller ones to stay under the 30k rule.

    Is it a Royal London Talisman plan or an ex CIS personal pension? (the former has very good GARs. The latter less so)
    What are the GARs?

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thanks for the response Dunstonh. Yes, it is an ex cis pension. The GARs are 4% pre 97 and 2.8% Post I think (don't have the paperwork in front of me). This is with 3% escalation and 50% spouse at 60. The other pot I believe is 6% level. Thanks
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,764 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks for the response Dunstonh. Yes, it is an ex cis pension. The GARs are 4% pre 97 and 2.8% Post I think (don't have the paperwork in front of me). This is with 3% escalation and 50% spouse at 60. The other pot I believe is 6% level. Thanks
    I fear you may struggle. 

    An adviser overruling a GAR to allow you to transfer to a scheme of your own is a high-risk transaction that will cost the adviser firm every year forevermore (its an underwriting question on their liability insurance and often each case is asked about individually and risk assessed and premium adjusted).   You will no doubt find an adviser willing to offer their services but I suspect the price will be set to reflect the risk.  And that price will be high relative to the fund values.  I would expect many advisers to say it's not cost-effective for them or you to offer that advice.

    It is possible that Royal London will run another opportunity to buy you out of the GAR.  They did this for ex Scottish Life plans in 2018.  They have yet to do it for other brands they have taken on.   
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Yes, I agree that it would not be cost effective so we won't be pursuing it. I was aware of the Scottish Life buy out and hope that we get the opportunity as well, we have 3 years before she turns 60.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.