We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Aviva Pensions - Choice of Available Funds
Comments
-
Albermarle said:Here is an article about Passive Investing that could be of interest .
Passive investing Archives - Monevator
Regarding active funds , just be aware there are thousands of them so difficult to make a generalised comment.
Thanks - there does seem to plenty of useful info there. I'll have a read.0 -
Have you been steering your clients away from those behemoths?dunstonh said:Well, opinions are indeed like a**holes - everyone has one!Possibly. However, people were saying the same about the mighty tech companies just over 20 years ago before they went on to fall 90%. Many of those mighty tech companies of the day are minnows or no longer exist now.
Mine is that you'd be mad to bet against the might of the FAANG stocks.
Tech companies can be destructive which is great for them when it pays off but they are also at high risk of a competitor doing it to them. They are also at risk of fashion changes.
They remain in the vanguard of technology. AI/ML/DL - all areas that will bring massive change to our lives in the next 20 years, & that itself will drive growth.
Sure, there will be startups that will develop new cool stuff….& if you can pick and invest in those at the right time: great!…..but as the OP put it, there is a VERY high chance those behemoths will suck them up: have you seen how much cash they have?!
Yes, there will be bumps along the way: I mentioned elsewhere how the place I worked at went from 150 to 6 inside a year around 2000….maybe I was at one of those you are referring to!
That said….6 months before it spiralled up to 150, it was around 17…. a year later, back above 20. Now? A multi $Bn heavyweight. Not everyone is Lehman Bros!
Are they over-valued? By normal metrics, I would say so….but the world today is not the world of 1990….I feel sure one chirpy poster will be along to point out how dangerous that suggestion is - you know who you are - but I would suggest it is dangerous to ignore what is happening….Plan for tomorrow, enjoy today!0 -
From my research so far these companies are in so many funds that it could be quiet difficult to specifically exclude them. My view is to put my pension into some different funds. This will mean that I have some exposure to these companies but in smaller amounts. I would assume that they still have room to grow further via acquisitions but that their growth will slow vs that of the last 5 + years.cfw1994 said:
Have you been steering your clients away from those behemoths?dunstonh said:Well, opinions are indeed like a**holes - everyone has one!Possibly. However, people were saying the same about the mighty tech companies just over 20 years ago before they went on to fall 90%. Many of those mighty tech companies of the day are minnows or no longer exist now.
Mine is that you'd be mad to bet against the might of the FAANG stocks.
Tech companies can be destructive which is great for them when it pays off but they are also at high risk of a competitor doing it to them. They are also at risk of fashion changes.
They remain in the vanguard of technology. AI/ML/DL - all areas that will bring massive change to our lives in the next 20 years, & that itself will drive growth.
Sure, there will be startups that will develop new cool stuff….& if you can pick and invest in those at the right time: great!…..but as the OP put it, there is a VERY high chance those behemoths will suck them up: have you seen how much cash they have?!
Yes, there will be bumps along the way: I mentioned elsewhere how the place I worked at went from 150 to 6 inside a year around 2000….maybe I was at one of those you are referring to!
That said….6 months before it spiralled up to 150, it was around 17…. a year later, back above 20. Now? A multi $Bn heavyweight. Not everyone is Lehman Bros!
Are they over-valued? By normal metrics, I would say so….but the world today is not the world of 1990….I feel sure one chirpy poster will be along to point out how dangerous that suggestion is - you know who you are - but I would suggest it is dangerous to ignore what is happening….0 -
Have you been steering your clients away from those behemoths?I don't make recommendations on shares like most IFAs. However, my US equity satellite fund is heavier in US tech than the US core fund.Not everyone is Lehman Bros!You mean a major international company that everyone thought was too big to fail
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
