📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Best way to cut inheritance tax without gifting?

168101112

Comments

  • nick74
    nick74 Posts: 829 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Of course there is a way around this, but I can't see it being palatable to any of the parties concerned, to put it mildly. (This was once suggested on a tax planning course I attended!) Now that same-sex marriages are allowed, the OP's partner needs to marry the OP's mother...When the mother dies her 'wife' inherits everything tax-free. She is then free to marry OP and gift everything to him, tax free....
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 21,263 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 29 July 2021 at 5:30PM
    nick74 said:
    Of course there is a way around this, but I can't see it being palatable to any of the parties concerned, to put it mildly. (This was once suggested on a tax planning course I attended!) Now that same-sex marriages are allowed, the OP's partner needs to marry the OP's mother...When the mother dies her 'wife' inherits everything tax-free. She is then free to marry OP and gift everything to him, tax free....
    Or do a runner with the money :)
  • nick74
    nick74 Posts: 829 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    nick74 said:
    Of course there is a way around this, but I can't see it being palatable to any of the parties concerned, to put it mildly. (This was once suggested on a tax planning course I attended!) Now that same-sex marriages are allowed, the OP's partner needs to marry the OP's mother...When the mother dies her 'wife' inherits everything tax-free. She is then free to marry OP and gift everything to him, tax free....
    Or do a runner with the money :)
    Yes, that is one of the risks!
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,050 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Could Mum's reluctance to gift be because she doesn't approve of the OPs choice of partner or that they aren't married and "settled down"?
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • tommydog40
    tommydog40 Posts: 73 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    Have you considered a Whole of Life policy placed in trust?
    I suppose a whole of life policy placed into trust would only have to be large enough to offset any likely inheritance tax bill.  But would the premiums not be exorbitant for a 75 year old?
  • elouise01582
    elouise01582 Posts: 126 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    You would need to obtain some quotes to find out.
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,744 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    You would need to obtain some quotes to find out.
    I don't think a child has an insurable interest in a parent's life under English law. Mother would have to take out the policy herself and then assign the benefit (and the obligation to pay premia) to OP as soon as possible.
  • tommydog40
    tommydog40 Posts: 73 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper
    I don't think a child has an insurable interest in a parent's life under English law. Mother would have to take out the policy herself and then assign the benefit (and the obligation to pay premia) to OP as soon as possible.
     As long as I give her the money to pay the premiums, I don't think she would have a problem with that.  But at the age of 75, don't you think the premiums would be prohibitive if I wanted enough money to offset any inheritance tax on her death?  It's statistically unlikely that she will live for another 10 years and on that basis, the insurance company have to safeguard against making a loss.  But maybe this is the best idea mooted so far.
  • theoretica
    theoretica Posts: 12,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I don't think a child has an insurable interest in a parent's life under English law. Mother would have to take out the policy herself and then assign the benefit (and the obligation to pay premia) to OP as soon as possible.
     As long as I give her the money to pay the premiums, I don't think she would have a problem with that.  But at the age of 75, don't you think the premiums would be prohibitive if I wanted enough money to offset any inheritance tax on her death?  It's statistically unlikely that she will live for another 10 years and on that basis, the insurance company have to safeguard against making a loss.  But maybe this is the best idea mooted so far.
    Actually, the statistics I can find are that a 75 year old woman in England will live another 13.2 years (https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-outcomes-framework/august-2020).  You can't just use the average life expectancy as that average includes all the deaths under the age 75 which are not relevant. 

    But if you give her the money to pay the premiums it won't work - because it won't reduce the amount that is in her estate and subject to inheritance tax - it will just be you putting your money into a saving scheme and that is money that would never have been subject to inheritance tax.
    But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,
    Had the whole of their cash in his care.
    Lewis Carroll
  • Thanks - I try.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.