We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Chancellor Rishi Sunak hints at ruling out 8% pension rise

145791014

Comments

  • GunJack
    GunJack Posts: 11,880 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 9 July 2021 at 5:09PM

    I accept that private pensions are more popular than they used to be, but what happened to the rest of the money that people working in the 60s and 70s earnt over their working lives?

    Savings, buy-to-let properties, bigger owned properties, stock market investments .... these are all things that could provide for retirement. 
    for one thing, income tax standard rate was 30-odd% and personal allowance was tiny, a lot more deductions than now...and higher rate was a stonking 83%.

    The Thatcher govt started reducing rates after 1979, but it didn't drop below 30% until 1986. 
    ......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......

    I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple :D
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 9 July 2021 at 5:44PM
    michaels said:
    So lets see, the working age population who pay the pensioners incomes through their tax all put their lives on hold for over a year many suffering considerable financial hardships pretty much to save the lives of the pensioners (look up the deaths data 90% plus are over pension age) should now pay an extra £2bn in tax not just this year but every year so those same pensioners can all se a big jump in their standard of living whilst those same tax payers have almost all seen a fall in theirs.

    I thought it was the young who were supposed to be the Me Me Me greedy generation....
    I agree with you. The triple lock is and always was a stupid policy. All part of presenting the Conservative party as on the side of the older generations (without actually doing anything immediate). 

    But, the triple lock was a key headline policy of the government which was elected. The whole point of British democracy is that the government is supposed to implement its manifesto. 
    So what, Labour broke their headline promise not to raise tax rates after the financial crisis. If a crisis happens (or sometimes even if not) manifesto promises go out of the window.

  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,216 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    GunJack said:

    I accept that private pensions are more popular than they used to be, but what happened to the rest of the money that people working in the 60s and 70s earnt over their working lives?

    Savings, buy-to-let properties, bigger owned properties, stock market investments .... these are all things that could provide for retirement. 
    for one thing, income tax standard rate was 30-odd% and personal allowance was tiny, a lot more deductions than now...and higher rate was a stonking 83%.

    The Thatcher govt started reducing rates after 1979, but it didn't drop below 30% until 1986. 
    And Ni and VAT were much lower, and there was MIRAS - not sure what your point is?
    I think....
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 9 July 2021 at 5:52PM
    Alexland said:
    However the rise in earnings will be recalculated in some way just for this years calculation ,to take account of the special circumstances .
    Yes I think most voters and pensioners would accept that the triple lock wasn't intended and wouldn't be appropriate for these circumstances and so by exception a longer measurement period should be used that covers the volatility in earnings caused by the pandemic ensuring that over several years the SP has grown by the greater of the three measures which is still a good result for those benefiting and shouldn't cause any reasonable retirement plans to fail.
    Indeed, any reasonable person would agree. But it'll still be endlessly expolited by those who want to use it as a political weapon, although I think it will backfire...

  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,216 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 9 July 2021 at 6:00PM
    zagfles said:
    Alexland said:
    However the rise in earnings will be recalculated in some way just for this years calculation ,to take account of the special circumstances .
    Yes I think most voters and pensioners would accept that the triple lock wasn't intended and wouldn't be appropriate for these circumstances and so by exception a longer measurement period should be used that covers the volatility in earnings caused by the pandemic ensuring that over several years the SP has grown by the greater of the three measures which is still a good result for those benefiting and shouldn't cause any reasonable retirement plans to fail.
    Indeed, any reasonable person would agree. But it'll still be endlessly expolited by those who want to use it as a political weapon, although I think it will backfire...

    That is what I thought but reading the BBC HYS comments on it the opinion being expressed is very much that pensioners would be being screwed and should never vote Tory again :(

    Presumably a kite is being flown and the final outcome will depend on the feedback - £3bn per year is a lot to buy the votes of people who will definitely grumble but probably vote Tory anyway.
    I think....
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 9 July 2021 at 6:08PM
    michaels said:
    zagfles said:
    Alexland said:
    However the rise in earnings will be recalculated in some way just for this years calculation ,to take account of the special circumstances .
    Yes I think most voters and pensioners would accept that the triple lock wasn't intended and wouldn't be appropriate for these circumstances and so by exception a longer measurement period should be used that covers the volatility in earnings caused by the pandemic ensuring that over several years the SP has grown by the greater of the three measures which is still a good result for those benefiting and shouldn't cause any reasonable retirement plans to fail.
    Indeed, any reasonable person would agree. But it'll still be endlessly expolited by those who want to use it as a political weapon, although I think it will backfire...

    That is what I thought but reading the BBC HYS comments on it the opinion being expressed is very much that pensioners would be being screwed and should never vote Tory again :(

    Presumably a kite is being flown and the final outcome will depend on the feedback - £3bn per year is a lot to buy the votes of people who will definitely grumble but probably vote Tory anyway.
    I wouldn't take much notice of BBC HYS, it's getting as bad as tw*tter!

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,891 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    zagfles said:
    michaels said:
    So lets see, the working age population who pay the pensioners incomes through their tax all put their lives on hold for over a year many suffering considerable financial hardships pretty much to save the lives of the pensioners (look up the deaths data 90% plus are over pension age) should now pay an extra £2bn in tax not just this year but every year so those same pensioners can all se a big jump in their standard of living whilst those same tax payers have almost all seen a fall in theirs.

    I thought it was the young who were supposed to be the Me Me Me greedy generation....
    I agree with you. The triple lock is and always was a stupid policy. All part of presenting the Conservative party as on the side of the older generations (without actually doing anything immediate). 

    But, the triple lock was a key headline policy of the government which was elected. The whole point of British democracy is that the government is supposed to implement its manifesto. 
    So what, Labour broke their headline promise not to raise tax rates after the financial crisis. If a crisis happens (or sometimes even if not) manifesto promises go out of the window.

    Remember what George Bush said before being elected  ' Read my lips NO MORE TAXES' and within about 18 months had to put them up .
  • Eldi_Dos said:
    Winger Fuel Payment
    Christmas Bonus
    Bus pass
    Eye test
    Prescriptions
    If you live in Scotland, then you get free prescriptions and eye tests at any age, free bus pass at 60

    I live in Scotland and benefit from these policies.My local council issue our bus passes and part of the deal is we pay them £170+ on the first of the month to the council. Kind of rankles when its referred to as free.
    Aye, higher tax take from Scottish workers funds the "free" stuff.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 9 July 2021 at 6:47PM
    Eldi_Dos said:
    Winger Fuel Payment
    Christmas Bonus
    Bus pass
    Eye test
    Prescriptions
    If you live in Scotland, then you get free prescriptions and eye tests at any age, free bus pass at 60

    I live in Scotland and benefit from these policies.My local council issue our bus passes and part of the deal is we pay them £170+ on the first of the month to the council. Kind of rankles when its referred to as free.
    Aye, higher tax take from Scottish workers funds the "free" stuff.
    And the Barnett formula which allocates about 20% pp extra

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.