We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Where there is a will ...

Ownership of property by couples can be in one of two forms.
I think that only one "legal person" can actually own the property.
I think also that in the case of two people owning the same property the property is owned by a Trust which itself a "legal person" and the two people concerned are the joint beneficiaries of that trust in one way or another.
All that is by the by and it is not a matter of fact but only my personal understanding or misunderstanding of the law on this sub subject.

I now come to the nub of this message.

Should you choose to own your property with your partner as Joint Tenants or as Tenants in Common or as JTs or TICs for short.

If you are in danger of paying Inheritance Tax it might be better to own the property as TICs.

Owning as TICs makes it easier to exploit your two separate Nil Rate Band of £263,000 for Inheritance Tax purposes thus shielding, at present, over half a million from the tax man.

If you only use one Nil Rate Band tax allowance it may cost you an additional £100,000 in Inheritance Tax.

On the other hand if you are not married to your partner.

Then perhaps you should consider being Joint Tenants.
This means that the whole value of the property following the death of one partner automatically belongs to the surviving partner.  Hence there is no inheritance to pay on the value of the half of the house which belonged in a sense to the deceased partner.
At present whereas a wife or husband can leave all their money tax free to their spouse this concession is not, as yet, available in the case of partners.


This is a simplification of the law.
The amount at stake is about £100,000 of Inheritance tax.
If it costs you a shilling or two to get it sorted perhaps it is money well spent.

If you think this has got nothing to do with you let me tell you that 40 years ago, when I bought a large 4 bedroom house for £5000,  I thought it had nothing to do with me.  It does now though.

To TIC or not to TIC that is my question
...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym

Comments

  • gus
    gus Posts: 23 Forumite
    TIC for a married couple is advisable.

    Be careful if you are looking to use both nil rate bands, by giving one half of a property to children on the death of the first spouse.

    Although you may think your children are wonderful, all sorts of things can happen that may threaten the use of the family home by the surviving spouse.

    e.g. son marries - it all goes pear shaped - messy divorce - Mum forced to vacate house so it can be sold.
  • My current plan is:-

    TIC the house.
    Leave everything to each other in will
    Survivor has two years in which they can vary the will
    Survivor decides what to do and varies the will.
    Nobody can object as the will does not name any other beneficiaries
    Survivor can transfer up to the Nil Rate Band at the time tax free to whoever e.g. Children /Grandchildren etc

    Many wills , ours included, have a paragraph along the lines of :--

    Everything to my wife if she survives me by X months where X can be one or more than one.
    This is to avoid the partner ending up with all the assets and only one Nil Rate Band.

    [MOVE]This thread could save someone £100,000 !!![/Move]
    ...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym
  • klondyke
    klondyke Posts: 463 Forumite
    Survivor has two years in which they can vary the will

    True as law stands at the moment, but They are constantly threatening to abolish this, so maybe best not to rely on it if you intend living a long time.
  • I think to transfer from Joint Tenancy to Tenants in Common does not cost anything. One person merely has to say to the other person that their joint ownerhsip is now Tenants in Common. It does not even require the agreement of the other party.

    Who do they have to say it to.
    Who else, if anyone, do they need to tell.
    Isn't there something written down somewhere alread saying you are Joint Tenants and does that not need altering.
    ...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym
  • Cheers.

    I will now save £100,000 at no cost rather than at a relatvely small cost. ;););)
    ...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.