We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Offset Mortgage

mr_shinobi`
Posts: 8 Forumite

Hi All
I have been applying for an offset mortgage with a building society. All went went well, until we reached the part where they advised me what the best product was for me.
I assumed that the lower rate product (with an arrangement fee) would be better than a higher rate product (without an arrangement fee). The building society advised that it would be cheaper to go for the higher rate product - I'm very confused, and they can't seem to explain their rationale! Here are the details:
1) Lower Rate: 1.99% fixed for five years + £1,000 arrangement fee + £700 valuation fee
2) Higher Rate: 2.29% fixed for five years + £700 valuation fee
I will borrow £700K, but have £300K in savings - which I will likely top up if I can save more. I am most interested in cost over the five year fix period (i.e. which is the cheapest). I see costs as total interest paid + fees. I see paying down of principal (this is a repayment mortgage) as a good thing, not a cost.
Any ideas why they would be advising me that the Higher Rate product is cheaper over five years?
Thanks in advance for an insight!
I have been applying for an offset mortgage with a building society. All went went well, until we reached the part where they advised me what the best product was for me.
I assumed that the lower rate product (with an arrangement fee) would be better than a higher rate product (without an arrangement fee). The building society advised that it would be cheaper to go for the higher rate product - I'm very confused, and they can't seem to explain their rationale! Here are the details:
1) Lower Rate: 1.99% fixed for five years + £1,000 arrangement fee + £700 valuation fee
2) Higher Rate: 2.29% fixed for five years + £700 valuation fee
I will borrow £700K, but have £300K in savings - which I will likely top up if I can save more. I am most interested in cost over the five year fix period (i.e. which is the cheapest). I see costs as total interest paid + fees. I see paying down of principal (this is a repayment mortgage) as a good thing, not a cost.
Any ideas why they would be advising me that the Higher Rate product is cheaper over five years?
Thanks in advance for an insight!
0
Comments
-
@mr_shinobi Plug in the numbers here https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/mortgages/compare-mortgage-rates/ to compare the two products.You can see which of the two comes out cheapest on a total cost plus balance outstanding at the end of the 5-year fix. I'm with you, with a 400-700k mortgage, very rough calcs (and making a few assumptions) indicate that the lower-rate fee option should be cheaper.The building society advisor should be explaining their rationale to you, there must be something they are basing their recommendation off of.
I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
1 -
The MSE calculation can get answers wrong.
( Not a big issue for large savings)
The very basic does it have a chance of being right is the interest only test.
rate difference X amount X years
0.003 X £400k X 5 = £6k
Repayment schedules reduce that saving but in the £100s not £1000s
The advisor need to show you why they think you can't save a £1k fee with a rate o.3% lower on 400k over 5 years.0 -
here are some numbers based repayment/offsetting options
for £400k 1.99% £1k V 2.29%
starting with the standard breakeven repayment size. based on term
Even on the shortest term 5 years you have a bigger net mortgage at £400k.term: size needed 5 £207,953.95 10 £185,946.07 15 £179,625.51 20 £176,637.37 25 £174,902.80 30 £173,774.35 IO £170,143.47
on a 25years schedule
better off by £4.7k after 5 yearsamount rate payment owing £401,000.00 1.99% £1,752.46 £332,455.25 £400,000.00 2.29% £1,752.46 £337,184.84
lets look at throwing £4k per month at the mortgage/offset roughly ~9y3m full term
at the end of the 5 years still better off by £3.6kamount rate payment owing £401,000.00 1.99% £4,000.00 £190,789.01 £400,000.00 2.29% £4,000.00 £194,452.79
£7k a month would have you close to fully offset at 5 years
Still £2.2k better offamount rate payment owing £401,000.00 1.99% £7,000.00 £1,694.14 £400,000.00 2.29% £7,000.00 £3,935.29
throw £10k per month fully offset by 3y6m
still better off a touch over £1k better offamount rate payment owing £401,000.00 1.99% £10,000.00 £5,292.58 £400,000.00 2.29% £10,000.00 £6,477.65
its not till you get to around 21.44k per month thrown at it does the no fee rate work out better, 1y7m to fully offsetamount rate payment owing £401,000.00 1.99% £21,400.00 £1,099.29 £400,000.00 2.29% £21,400.00 £1,095.69
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards