We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Ex relatives trying to sue me for a gift
Comments
- 
            
 I agree with thisThrugelmir said:
 Little point in chasing rabbits down holes. Wait to see what documentary evidence is forthcoming from those making the claim. Remember onus is entirely on them.Unfairclaim said:Thanks, what's a DSAR?0
- 
            
 Data Subject Access Request - ICO calls it SAR so probably simpler to call it thatNeruda said:Unfairclaim said:Thanks, what's a DSAR?
 Presumably a Subject Access Request. Under the law on data protection you have a right to see the information that organisations hold about you. I agree with Thrugelmir that doing this would be unnecessary.0
- 
            Thanks, there is nothing to request to see though as nothing ever existed, it is a made up claim
 regarding waiting for evidnce, when would i get to see any evidence? Is that when we both send in our statements?0
- 
            
 And you might want to point out that if this was a loan and these checks weren't done because your ex withheld the information, then you will be forwarding any documentation they provide to the court to the lender so they can proceed with a fraud investigation against your ex.bris said:If they said it was to buy a house the the solicitor dealing with the clients (OP) at the time are legally obliged to make money laundering checks on the "gift".
 0
- 
            
 I would call and ask them, so you can tell the court that you tried to obtain the information and failed.Unfairclaim said:Thanks all for your replies
 I have not followed up on the cheque as the account was closed some time ago so I don't think it would be possible to go back for it
 There is also the potential that they still hold the information, although there might be a cost in them sending it out.
 If you find out now that it was paid into the joint account then you can downplay that in the argument, if it was her name only you can use it to your advantage
 0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
          
          
         