We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Contracting out and back in, SERPS, S2P and New State Pension

Options
2»

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,624 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The self employed were big winners too.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dunstonh said:
    The self employed were big winners too.
    Maybe, but tbf my impression of the system for a long time was that the self employed got a raw deal on NI.  If they paid the stamp as a higher SE earner they got no extra benefit from it to the best of my knowledge (this group included me for a few years) as opposed to PAYE who got SERPS or equiv.
    That's just an 'impression' though, no real knowledge back then, so I do stand to be corrected if I'm wrong.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,409 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    dunstonh said:
    The self employed were big winners too.
    Maybe, but tbf my impression of the system for a long time was that the self employed got a raw deal on NI.  If they paid the stamp as a higher SE earner they got no extra benefit from it to the best of my knowledge (this group included me for a few years) as opposed to PAYE who got SERPS or equiv.
    That's just an 'impression' though, no real knowledge back then, so I do stand to be corrected if I'm wrong.
    But SE NI conts were around 8% or so from memory, compared to around 25% employee plus employer conts for non SE. Used to be no SERPS/S2P accrual for the SE but then they got accrual for the full new state pension which replaced both basic & SERPS, backdated too for those who reached state pension age after April 2016.
    So the SE were definitely big winners!

  • zagfles said:
    dunstonh said:
    The self employed were big winners too.
    Maybe, but tbf my impression of the system for a long time was that the self employed got a raw deal on NI.  If they paid the stamp as a higher SE earner they got no extra benefit from it to the best of my knowledge (this group included me for a few years) as opposed to PAYE who got SERPS or equiv.
    That's just an 'impression' though, no real knowledge back then, so I do stand to be corrected if I'm wrong.
    But SE NI conts were around 8% or so from memory, compared to around 25% employee plus employer conts for non SE. Used to be no SERPS/S2P accrual for the SE but then they got accrual for the full new state pension which replaced both basic & SERPS, backdated too for those who reached state pension age after April 2016.
    So the SE were definitely big winners!

    OK, fair enough.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.