We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Moving business

We currently have an online business which we started in lockdown.  It doesn't make any money BUT WE cover alll costs and any profit goes into improving the range and buying more stock. Its almost therapy for my other half who has suffered with mental illness, this keeps her occupied.

 A slug of our costs are £14k on serviced accommodation.  I have suggested that now we have proved we can tick along slowly expanding we could use that £14k to rent a large house and actually run the business from one of the large rooms.   
Even though we make zero money we would at least get some benefit ftom living somewhere half decent.  
Its not intrusive as its alk online, we have no visitors, although we have one delivery once a month.  Landlord says its fine. 
Is this feasible re business rates ?
I appreciate we can only write off say 20% but we dont pay tax anyway as we dont draw a salary or profits. 



«1

Comments

  • You will have to clarify. You have said, in the same sentence, that ‘it doesn’t make any money BUT....any profit goes into improving the range and buying more stock’

    That suggests that there is a profit in that you have more and better quality stock at the end of the year than at the start. 
  • Deramore12
    Deramore12 Posts: 19 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts
    I'll clarify we basically keep ploughing money back into the business and make no drawings and do not take a wage.
  • I'll clarify we basically keep ploughing money back into the business and make no drawings and do not take a wage.
    Let’s say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You take all of the 12000 out of the business. Your profit is 12000.

    Lets say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You use the whole 12000 to buy additional stock and it has a value at your accounts year end of 14000. You draw no money from the business. Your profit is 14000. 

    What you draw (take a wage) from the business is entirely irrelevant in determining profits.
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,786 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 22 January 2024 at 2:51PM
    I'll clarify we basically keep ploughing money back into the business and make no drawings and do not take a wage.
    Let’s say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You take all of the 12000 out of the business. Your profit is 12000.

    Lets say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You use the whole 12000 to buy additional stock and it has a value at your accounts year end of 14000. You draw no money from the business. Your profit is 14000. 

    What you draw (take a wage) from the business is entirely irrelevant in determining profits.
    Your profit is actually £12,000, because you value stock at the lower of cost and net realisable value (£12,000 rather than £14,000). (If you use the cash basis, and you still hold the stock at the accounts year end, your profit is zero in that first year because you expense it when you pay for it.)
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 16 March 2021 at 9:02PM
    I'll clarify we basically keep ploughing money back into the business and make no drawings and do not take a wage.
    Let’s say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You take all of the 12000 out of the business. Your profit is 12000.

    Lets say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You use the whole 12000 to buy additional stock and it has a value at your accounts year end of 14000. You draw no money from the business. Your profit is 14000. 

    What you draw (take a wage) from the business is entirely irrelevant in determining profits.
    Your profit is actually £12,000, because you value stock at the lower of cost and net realisable value (£12,000 rather than £14,000). (If you use the cash basis, and you still hold the stock at the accounts year end, your profit is zero in that first year because you expense it when you pay for it.)
    Thank you - I should have remembered that. Maybe leave stock valuations to the accountants? 👍
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,786 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 22 January 2024 at 2:51PM
    I'll clarify we basically keep ploughing money back into the business and make no drawings and do not take a wage.
    Let’s say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You take all of the 12000 out of the business. Your profit is 12000.

    Lets say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You use the whole 12000 to buy additional stock and it has a value at your accounts year end of 14000. You draw no money from the business. Your profit is 14000. 

    What you draw (take a wage) from the business is entirely irrelevant in determining profits.
    Your profit is actually £12,000, because you value stock at the lower of cost and net realisable value (£12,000 rather than £14,000). (If you use the cash basis, and you still hold the stock at the accounts year end, your profit is zero in that first year because you expense it when you pay for it.)
    Thank you - I should have remembered that. Maybe leave stock valuations to the accountants? 👍
    Leave the method of stock valuations to the accountants, yes, and they can tell you, for example, that you include home bred sheep in stock at market value less 25%, but don't ask them to come up with an actual stock valuation for 250 ewes on the side of a steep hill in the pouring rain, unless they are farmers or smallholders as well, like me!
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 22 January 2024 at 2:51PM
    I'll clarify we basically keep ploughing money back into the business and make no drawings and do not take a wage.
    Let’s say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You take all of the 12000 out of the business. Your profit is 12000.

    Lets say that, in your first year, your turnover was 15000 and your expenses 3000. You use the whole 12000 to buy additional stock and it has a value at your accounts year end of 14000. You draw no money from the business. Your profit is 14000. 

    What you draw (take a wage) from the business is entirely irrelevant in determining profits.
    Your profit is actually £12,000, because you value stock at the lower of cost and net realisable value (£12,000 rather than £14,000). (If you use the cash basis, and you still hold the stock at the accounts year end, your profit is zero in that first year because you expense it when you pay for it.)
    Thank you - I should have remembered that. Maybe leave stock valuations to the accountants? 👍
    Leave the method of stock valuations to the accountants, yes, and they can tell you, for example, that you include home bred sheep in stock at market value less 25%, but don't ask them to come up with an actual stock valuation for 250 ewes on the side of a steep hill in the pouring rain, unless they are farmers or smallholders as well, like me!
    A former boss of mine was a farmer and embarrassed me many a time. Thankfully, after leaving tax consultancy, I specialised in GP practices where valuations of stock or goodwill don’t  exist and was all too pleased about it.
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,786 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    I liked doing accounts for GP practices, although I haven't done any since the late 1970s.
  • I liked doing accounts for GP practices, although I haven't done any since the late 1970s.
    You wouldn’t recognise them now after new GP contract in 2004. No quarterly payments, GP budget for own employees etc etc - different world!
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'll clarify we basically keep ploughing money back into the business and make no drawings and do not take a wage.
    So who will be paying the other £11200 rent (80% of 14k)? 
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.