We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Potentially silly question

2»

Comments

  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,376 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Whichever fund, maybe one move is to switch off the lifestyling?
  • MTB1986
    MTB1986 Posts: 56 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    I have switched it from lifestyle to the 100% equities fund now LHW99, it’s been in lifestyle for a long time but now I understand a bit more I’m happy to move it to a higher risk fund to see what happens with it - hopefully it will grow well! 
  • If you are only 34 then the lifestyle option won't have made any difference. Normally lifestyling only starts moving your investments into safer options when you are about 10 years from your selected retirement date.
  • MTB1986
    MTB1986 Posts: 56 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Greatkingrat, I had a look at the fund sheet and it looked like it was about 80% equities, with some bonds/gilts and cash making up the remainder, and it said as I got towards retirement age the percentage of gilts and cash would increase. Not sure exactly as the fund sheet wasn’t very clear, but that’s what it looked like to me. 
  • JohnWinder
    JohnWinder Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    At the risk of being repetitive, here are a couple of pieces discussing 'home bias' in equities:
    Vanguard's thoughts on 'home bias'; they're not fixed in stone, and might be flawed, but grist for the mill. Search for 'Global Equity investing: the benefits of diversification and sizing your allocation, February 2019.'
    'The author believes that this study makes a convincing case to seek a high exposure to global (or international) equities, while keeping a tilt towards domestic equities. Some readers might perceive otherwise, but should by now have more factual material to refine their thinking and possible temptations of home country bias.'
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,960 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    It is a good link . Interesting that they look at different % domestic for stocks but use 100% domestic bonds .
    Often when this home bias issue is mentioned on the forum the bonds side is often ignored , geographically speaking .
    I think the famous VLS funds are 25% UK for both equity and bonds ,
    My portfolio is also approx 25% UK , but the equity portion is less at around 15% and the bonds /others ( property, infrastructure etc ) around 35% UK
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.