📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Increase to Minimum Pension age from 55 to 57 on 6th April 2028

Options
1151618202130

Comments

  • jsinc
    jsinc Posts: 318 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 15 September 2021 at 5:53PM
    granta said:
    jsinc said:
    Interesting article. Key message seems to hang on "things being confusing for everyone" but is there anything else behind the ABI's stance?

    I've been informed by Utmost (formerly Equitable Life) that my small pot with them has access at 55 written in 'unless government position changes'. I don't know what means in practice and whether the above will impact it?
    I agree with them on confusing and likely distortions. But their members (https://www.abi.org.uk/about-the-abi/abi-members/) earn fees and profits from investments, pensions and annuities etc. If they were also lobbying to address "poor outcomes" via e.g. a higher State Pension then I'd be less cynical, but they're not.

    I don't know what the outcome will be. Expect there's a lot of similar lobbying behind the scenes, but that Government even drafted this protection means there must be substantial contrary opinion out there too.

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    granta said:
    jsinc said:


    I've been informed by Utmost (formerly Equitable Life) that my small pot with them has access at 55 written in 'unless government position changes'. I don't know what means in practice and whether the above will impact it?
    Being a EL client of the past. Cannot recall the precise ins and outs. Other than my scheme age was moved from 50 to 55.  
  • So if I was born in 1970 this won’t affect me right as I will be 55 in 2025 - 3 years before this comes in in 2028? And in 2028 I will be 58 anyway so over 57.
  • granta
    granta Posts: 508 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    granta said:
    jsinc said:


    I've been informed by Utmost (formerly Equitable Life) that my small pot with them has access at 55 written in 'unless government position changes'. I don't know what means in practice and whether the above will impact it?
    Being a EL client of the past. Cannot recall the precise ins and outs. Other than my scheme age was moved from 50 to 55.  
    Interesting. I was going to transfer out (perhaps to Fidelity SIPP) but they've said I would lose the protection unless the new schemes has a guaranteed age of access of 55. But doesn't look like anything is guaranteed anyway. I'll just carry on paying their higher charges for now!
  • Cus
    Cus Posts: 779 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    So I have just opened a Fidelity SIPP.  I've put the minimum £1k in. 
    So if in the near future I transfer from my AJ bell youinvest sipp, any thoughts on whether moving from a '57 age' one to a '55 age' one will be ok or will fidelity turn round to me and say that as the money came from a 'no guarantee so a 57 age' sipp they will not let me take at 55?
    So will I need to build up the fidelity sipp by only directly adding using annual allowances? 
    Thoughts appreciated, won't hold you to it 😉
  • RoadToRiches
    RoadToRiches Posts: 221 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 23 September 2021 at 9:23AM
    So if I was born in 1970 this won’t affect me right as I will be 55 in 2025 - 3 years before this comes in in 2028? And in 2028 I will be 58 anyway so over 57.
    Worryingly I have just asked in web chat on pensionwise the same question and they cannot give any guarantee that this date could not be brought forward to catch others out.

    And what they did with triple locks does not hold up much confidence that they don't try something like this.

    Should I invest in fidelity to be able to transfer in at a later date and guarantee the 55 pension now?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,722 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 23 September 2021 at 9:58AM
    I've been informed by Utmost (formerly Equitable Life) that my small pot with them has access at 55 written in 'unless government position changes'. I don't know what means in practice and whether the above will impact it?
    Where the scheme rules refer to the NMPA or its underlying legislation (for example, permitting benefits to be taken from the lowest age consistent with the Finance Act 2004 regime) that would not confer an unqualified right to a PPA.  

    That is how most personal pensions, SIPPs and stakeholder pensions work.   They nearly always DO NOT have an unqualified right under the scheme rules.   A rough guide is that if your pension age increased to 55 when the minimum age went up to 55 then yours will also go up to 57.

    There are still some holes in the definition of what an unqualified right means with HMRC planning to give some examples in due course.

    Worryingly I have just asked in web chat on pensionwise the same question and they cannot give any guarantee that this date could not be brought forward to catch others out.
    Remember the remit of Pensionwise is that it cannot give advice or opinion.   So, it is technically correct that they cannot give a guarantee.   Nor can anyone else for that matter.  Although it would be extremely unlikely to change at this late stage.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Cus said:
    So if in the near future I transfer from my AJ bell youinvest sipp, any thoughts on whether moving from a '57 age' one to a '55 age' one will be ok or will fidelity turn round to me and say that as the money came from a 'no guarantee so a 57 age' sipp they will not let me take at 55?
    From what I can see of the draft legislation you should be fine to transfer from an age 57 scheme (unsure if this is confirmed for AJ Bell yet?) into an existing age 55 scheme that was opened before 6th April 2023. However with nothing being final yet then I have stopped doing any transfers between schemes for now as we already have enough in an age 55 scheme to meet our needs.
    Worryingly I have just asked in web chat on pensionwise the same question and they cannot give any guarantee that this date could not be brought forward to catch others out.
    Nothing to worry about Pensionwise know this is not approved yet so can't assure you on aspects of it which may change.
    Should I invest in fidelity to be able to transfer in at a later date and guarantee the 55 pension now?
    Not much cost to open a small Fidleity account now (you can start with £20+£5 per month then cancel after a few months all on percentage charges if you stick to traditional funds) although the draft legislation should give you enough time after it's expected to be approved to take any required actions.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,722 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    From what I can see of the draft legislation you should be fine to transfer from an age 57 scheme (unsure if this is confirmed for AJ Bell yet?) into an existing age 55 scheme that was opened before 6th April 2023. However with nothing being final yet then I have stopped doing any transfers between schemes for now as we already have enough in an age 55 scheme to meet our needs.
    Yes, there is a limited window that will allow you to join or transfer benefits into a scheme with an unqualified right to a PPA providing it is done before 5th April 2023.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • hugheskevi
    hugheskevi Posts: 4,504 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 12 October 2021 at 3:22PM
    Interesting article in Pension Age today, about the Association of British Insurers' (ABI) concern about the change to Minimum Pension age - article available at this link.

    The concern is well rehearsed and has been voiced a number of times in recent weeks, and has been supported by AJ Bell. The concern is about the complexity of protection regimes lasting decades, and ABI want the process paused and ideally aligned with 2010 changes to minimum pension age from 50 to 55 so that no additional protections are given out - meaning almost all individuals would have a minimum pension age of 57.

    However, of more interest is that the article includes a response from a HM Treasury spokesperson, which is quite definitive:
    "We believe it’s right to protect pension savers whose scheme rules provide them with an unqualified legal right to take pension benefits before age 57."

    “That is why earlier in the year we set out the details of the framework and have been consulting on the technicalities to ensure it is as simple and fair as possible.”
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.