We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Time to remortgage - fixed or tracker
Slappermum
Posts: 48 Forumite
My 2 year deal (95% LTV, 2.99%) is coming to an end in 3 months. The lender is offering several options, the only ones worth considering are:
2 year fixed at 2.69% with £999 product fee - total cost over 2 years £23,311, remaining balance after 2 years £223,615
2 year tracker at 2.69% + BoE base rate (so 2.79% currently and I don't see this going up significantly any time soon) with £999 product fee - total cost over 2 years £23,610, remaining balance after 2 years £233,779. No exit fess.
I could shop around with other providers, but none seem to be offering anything significantly better at 85% LTV.
The rates for 80% LTV seem significantly better. I was thinking of going for the tracker for another 6-12 months to get my LTV to 80% through a combination of overpayments (been doing this regularly anyway) and increase in property value and then fixing at something a lot closer to 2%. Affordability/job security not an issue. Obviously, if 85% LTV rates drop in the next three months I would consider those.
Please point out the flaws in my logic. Cheers!
2 year fixed at 2.69% with £999 product fee - total cost over 2 years £23,311, remaining balance after 2 years £223,615
2 year tracker at 2.69% + BoE base rate (so 2.79% currently and I don't see this going up significantly any time soon) with £999 product fee - total cost over 2 years £23,610, remaining balance after 2 years £233,779. No exit fess.
I could shop around with other providers, but none seem to be offering anything significantly better at 85% LTV.
The rates for 80% LTV seem significantly better. I was thinking of going for the tracker for another 6-12 months to get my LTV to 80% through a combination of overpayments (been doing this regularly anyway) and increase in property value and then fixing at something a lot closer to 2%. Affordability/job security not an issue. Obviously, if 85% LTV rates drop in the next three months I would consider those.
Please point out the flaws in my logic. Cheers!
0
Comments
-
If you are certain of moving to an 80% LTV band in 6 months, then why not switch to a zero fee zero ERC tracker like the Nationwide one. Nationwide always has rates close to the best, so you could just switch rates when it’s time.0
-
track and fix might be an option if you can get to 80% and a much better rate
You need to look at the no fee rate as well to crunch that over 6-12 months not the 2 years
something does not look right with those numbers
I suspect you have a typo for amount left after 2 years on the tracker £233,779.
edit:
Just realised I got those examples wrong for the end amounts taken them out
0 -
@getmore4less Yes, that was a typo, was meant to say £223,779. Basically, minimal difference between the two, but the tracker offers a lot more flexibility. No fee rates offered to me by my current lender are all at 2.99% and come with a 3% ERC so not really worth considering imo.
@ukri Shopping around for a 0 fee tracker with other providers is definitely an option, good shout!
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards