We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FCA investment pathways

I believe these are coming into existence as of 1st February (i.e. in two weeks), and I wondered if anyone had a "take" on them.

Comments

  • squirrelpie
    squirrelpie Posts: 1,477 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I confess I wasn't even aware of them before now! I just looked at https://www.ftadviser.com/pensions/2020/09/09/what-the-fca-s-rules-on-investment-pathways-mean-for-clients/ and they seem like a reasonable idea. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, of course, so I'll be interested to see what kind of performance the various schemes have over the next year or so.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 18 January 2021 at 6:16PM
    Many providers have had the equivalent for many years.  The track records on them isn't great in terms of investment returns (not bad. not best.  Pretty consistent around the average)   Pathways just forces those that haven't to offer a solution that avoids people ending up in cash.

    If you have an adviser then you won't use them in most cases (although possible on transactional advice).  If you DIY on your investments and have a bit of knowledge then you wont use them.  If you have low knowledge in investing and CBA then they are perfect for you.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    They're a good idea, similar to workplace pensions where there's usually a default pathway or selection of a few defaults (based on risk, intention etc) during accumulation and increasingly during drawdown. Most peoples' requirements in retirement are likely to be similar to large groups of others, so individually tailored retirement plans for many will be unnecessary, a sensible selection of investment "pathways" may be more appropriate. 
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,405 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Pity they haven't put a charge cap on. May encourage some suppliers to put more profit in their charges than is perhaps strictly justified. Those who are more likely to use the options are probably less likely to shop around.
  • EdSwippet
    EdSwippet Posts: 1,678 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    LHW99 said:
    Pity they haven't put a charge cap on. May encourage some suppliers to put more profit in their charges than is perhaps strictly justified. ...
    ... or, simply recommend only their own fee-padded in-house funds:

    Savers will be offered four simple ways to invest and draw on pension pots
    AJ Bell Youinvest
    AJ Bell has gone down the route of recommending its in-house funds.


    And yet, from Andy Bell just a few months ago:

    Andy Bell Writes to New FCA Boss Over ‘Fundamentally Flawed’ Investment Pathways
    Investment pathways risk funnelling people into investments that do not suit their needs or retirement priorities and are a mandate for pension providers to line their pockets by peddling their own in-house funds with little or no control on fund charges.

    Quite a case of cognitive dissonance there!
  • garmeg
    garmeg Posts: 771 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    EdSwippet said:
    LHW99 said:
    Pity they haven't put a charge cap on. May encourage some suppliers to put more profit in their charges than is perhaps strictly justified. ...
    ... or, simply recommend only their own fee-padded in-house funds:

    Savers will be offered four simple ways to invest and draw on pension pots
    AJ Bell Youinvest
    AJ Bell has gone down the route of recommending its in-house funds.


    And yet, from Andy Bell just a few months ago:

    Andy Bell Writes to New FCA Boss Over ‘Fundamentally Flawed’ Investment Pathways
    Investment pathways risk funnelling people into investments that do not suit their needs or retirement priorities and are a mandate for pension providers to line their pockets by peddling their own in-house funds with little or no control on fund charges.

    Quite a case of cognitive dissonance there!
    Their in house funds are reasonable value though. Not a rip off. Unlike some.
  • EdSwippet
    EdSwippet Posts: 1,678 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    garmeg said:
    Their in house funds are reasonable value though. Not a rip off. Unlike some.
    Meh. From https://www.youinvest.co.uk/investment-ideas/ajbell-funds

    Low cost – there’s no dealing charge to buy a fund. The annual ongoing charge is capped at 0.35% for the growth funds, and 1.00% for the income funds and our custody charge is just 0.25%.

    For fund charges, a 1% OCF is pretty much the top end of things these days. The 0.35% is slightly better. (But note that these exclude the added 0.25% Youinvest platform charge). A considerable hike on the 0.07-0.24% charges shown for Interactive Investor's selection of pathway funds.

  • garmeg
    garmeg Posts: 771 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    EdSwippet said:
    garmeg said:
    Their in house funds are reasonable value though. Not a rip off. Unlike some.
    Meh. From https://www.youinvest.co.uk/investment-ideas/ajbell-funds

    Low cost – there’s no dealing charge to buy a fund. The annual ongoing charge is capped at 0.35% for the growth funds, and 1.00% for the income funds and our custody charge is just 0.25%.

    For fund charges, a 1% OCF is pretty much the top end of things these days. The 0.35% is slightly better. (But note that these exclude the added 0.25% Youinvest platform charge). A considerable hike on the 0.07-0.24% charges shown for Interactive Investor's selection of pathway funds.

    Do you have a list of Interactive Investor's funds at all?
  • EdSwippet
    EdSwippet Posts: 1,678 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    garmeg said:
    Do you have a list of Interactive Investor's funds at all?
    Indicated in the This is Money article, as linked in the previous thread:

    A couple of DIY online brokers have previewed what funds they will be using for each 'pathway' and why they think they are suitable.
    ...
  • garmeg
    garmeg Posts: 771 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    EdSwippet said:
    garmeg said:
    Do you have a list of Interactive Investor's funds at all?
    Indicated in the This is Money article, as linked in the previous thread:

    A couple of DIY online brokers have previewed what funds they will be using for each 'pathway' and why they think they are suitable.
    ...
    Thanks. A lot cheaper than AJ Bell's choices.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.