We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Inheriting pension - tax question

2»

Comments

  • mark55man
    mark55man Posts: 8,221 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 18 January 2021 at 9:22PM
    so does the pot the children inherit count to their LTA? and if the pot is over your own LTA at the point you pop your clogs what happens then in regard to tax??  thank you
    I think I saw you in an ice cream parlour
    Drinking milk shakes, cold and long
    Smiling and waving and looking so fine
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,551 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 18 January 2021 at 9:53PM
    mark55man said:
    so does the pot the children inherit count to their LTA? and if the pot is over your own LTA at the point you pop your clogs what happens then in regard to tax??  thank you
    The LTA of the deceased is relevant, not the beneficaries. If death under 75 and uncrystallised funds are designated within 2 years then a BCE applies and an LTA charge will be payable if the deceased's LTA is exceeded. It's possible to avoid the LTA test by leaving it over 2 years, but then the pot is taxable on the recipient.
    No LTA test on crystallised funds on death, or on death over 75.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,351 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    triplea35 said:
    tacpot12 said:
    The best advice to your beneficiaries is to leave the money where it is until they retire and use it to give them a better retirement than they otherwise would have had.  Only if there is an urgent requirement to clear debts (e.g. their house is about to be repossessed) would it make sense to draw the money out if they have to pay income tax above the basic rate on it. 
    If you died before age 75 would it not be better for the beneficiary to take the pot tax free and, if keeping it for retirement feed it into their own pension and by doing so obtain further tax benefit? 
    Maybe keep their own pension to pass on (beyond the 25%) and enough to use the personal allowance and use the inherited to supply a tax free income above that and feed back in a lump sum if they wish.   You could play around with scenarios and outcomes.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.