We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Anyone familiar with USS pension?

The USS pension Normal Retirement Date increased to 66 in October to reflect the increase in SPA. What I’m trying to understand is if this affects the pension I built up whilst working for universities between 2005 and 2017, or whether it only relates to pension built up since the increase. As I’m 57 now my SPA will increase to 67 so if I am affected it makes quite a difference to my retirement planning.

I can’t seem to get a clear answer from the USS website (some info says 66, but the benefit modeller still calculates to 65) and I received an unhelpful answer in response to my email enquiry so I’m hoping someone here can help.

Comments

  • SMcGill
    SMcGill Posts: 295 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Good heavens, if I could figure out how to post a heart emoji to you I would! I wasn’t aware of the early retirement factor either so my mood has now swung from slightly worried to cautiously pleased. I’ll read the doc on your link, looks like something I wish I’d stumbled over sooner.
  • Yes, it took some finding - it is under the section for financial advisors. I am not certain my interpretation is correct. I understand that member are entitled to one free quotation a year - so that might be the best bet to get the official line. 
  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 4,893 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    My understanding is it only relates to the pension built up since the increase.
    The link below also suggests that for service from 1 April 1995 to 30 September 2011 early retirement factor are only applied below 63.5 years.
    https://www.uss.co.uk/-/media/project/ussmainsite/files/financial-advisers/mfuss-for-ifa.pdf?rev=e83c6925f0d54db9aa15251679cc5626

    Thank you for that document!
    I'm a deferred member, with 8 years service between 1996 and 2004. My deferred members letter dated 2004 states my scheme retirement age is 65, but also states (in the small print) that I can request to take my pension from age 63.5 without any reduction (although I believe 65 remains the scheme normal retirement age). Why would anyone not want to take their pension 1.5 years early with no reduction? Once I hit 63 I will be phoning the administrators to confirm I would like to start taking my pension at 63.5. Presumably this clause was introduced in response to equalising the scheme retirement age of men and women.

    Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter
  • AlanP_2
    AlanP_2 Posts: 3,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    NedS said:
    My understanding is it only relates to the pension built up since the increase.
    The link below also suggests that for service from 1 April 1995 to 30 September 2011 early retirement factor are only applied below 63.5 years.
    https://www.uss.co.uk/-/media/project/ussmainsite/files/financial-advisers/mfuss-for-ifa.pdf?rev=e83c6925f0d54db9aa15251679cc5626

    Thank you for that document!
    I'm a deferred member, with 8 years service between 1996 and 2004. My deferred members letter dated 2004 states my scheme retirement age is 65, but also states (in the small print) that I can request to take my pension from age 63.5 without any reduction (although I believe 65 remains the scheme normal retirement age). Why would anyone not want to take their pension 1.5 years early with no reduction? Once I hit 63 I will be phoning the administrators to confirm I would like to start taking my pension at 63.5. Presumably this clause was introduced in response to equalising the scheme retirement age of men and women.


    Check the underlying details out.

    I am a deferred member of a scheme (not USS) that has a NRA of 65 but the pension can be taken unreduced at 60.

    Using your understandable logic I should take it at 60, BUT, it increases by 7.5% pa until GMP age of 65 so I would lose out in monetary terms.

    This is probabaly only an issue when the pension is deferred, if I was still working there then I wouldn't be getting the 7.5% pa uplift.


    So, what happens to your deferred USS pension between 63.5 and 65?  
  • hyubh
    hyubh Posts: 3,779 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AlanP_2 said:
    Using your understandable logic I should take it at 60, BUT, it increases by 7.5% pa until GMP age of 65 so I would lose out in monetary terms.

    This is probabaly only an issue when the pension is deferred, if I was still working there then I wouldn't be getting the 7.5% pa uplift.


    So, what happens to your deferred USS pension between 63.5 and 65?  
    By the by, but the USS operates a public sector treatment of GMP, so S148 not fixed rate revaluation (amongst other things).
  • AlanP_2
    AlanP_2 Posts: 3,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 17 December 2020 at 9:57AM
    hyubh said:
    AlanP_2 said:
    Using your understandable logic I should take it at 60, BUT, it increases by 7.5% pa until GMP age of 65 so I would lose out in monetary terms.

    This is probabaly only an issue when the pension is deferred, if I was still working there then I wouldn't be getting the 7.5% pa uplift.


    So, what happens to your deferred USS pension between 63.5 and 65?  
    By the by, but the USS operates a public sector treatment of GMP, so S148 not fixed rate revaluation (amongst other things).
    Thanks. I was more highlighting the point that pension "rules" can be quite complex and interact with each other to affect an individual's situation.

    NedS said "Why would anyone not want to take their pension 1.5 years early with no reduction".

    I was outlining a situation that answered that point even though superficially the approach would be to take at 60 with no actuarial reduction.

    By the by for me and this deferred pension anyway as I am planning to take the CETV next year.
  • Southend1
    Southend1 Posts: 3,362 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    My understanding is it only relates to the pension built up since the increase.
    The link below also suggests that for service from 1 April 1995 to 30 September 2011 early retirement factor are only applied below 63.5 years.
    https://www.uss.co.uk/-/media/project/ussmainsite/files/financial-advisers/mfuss-for-ifa.pdf?rev=e83c6925f0d54db9aa15251679cc5626

    Interesting! Thanks for sharing the link. 

    Does anyone know whether the final salary pension can be taken independently of the retirement income builder pension? So if someone with membership spanning pre and post October 2016 has stopped working by age 63.5 and wants to take the final salary pension at that age unreduced for service between 1 April 1995 and 30 September 2011, but continue deferral of the income builder pension until NPA - would that be possible? Or does all the DB pension have to be commenced at the same time?
  • Southend1 said:
    My understanding is it only relates to the pension built up since the increase.
    The link below also suggests that for service from 1 April 1995 to 30 September 2011 early retirement factor are only applied below 63.5 years.
    https://www.uss.co.uk/-/media/project/ussmainsite/files/financial-advisers/mfuss-for-ifa.pdf?rev=e83c6925f0d54db9aa15251679cc5626

    Interesting! Thanks for sharing the link. 

    Does anyone know whether the final salary pension can be taken independently of the retirement income builder pension? So if someone with membership spanning pre and post October 2016 has stopped working by age 63.5 and wants to take the final salary pension at that age unreduced for service between 1 April 1995 and 30 September 2011, but continue deferral of the income builder pension until NPA - would that be possible? Or does all the DB pension have to be commenced at the same time?
    No pretty certain you can't do that. The early retirement factors are pretty generous (at the moment). So it may not make a huge difference if you have the majority of your pension in the final salary section.
    Incidentally, one nugget of information that caught my eye was " If you are aged 50 or more, with five years’ service, are made redundant and you have been paying into USS 
    continuously since 5 April 2006, you will be entitled to access your pension from age 50". I assume unreduced.

  • My understanding is it only relates to the pension built up since the increase.
    The link below also suggests that for service from 1 April 1995 to 30 September 2011 early retirement factor are only applied below 63.5 years.
    https://www.uss.co.uk/-/media/project/ussmainsite/files/financial-advisers/mfuss-for-ifa.pdf?rev=e83c6925f0d54db9aa15251679cc5626

    Thanks from me too, that link is really useful. Particulary the generous calculation of final salary for pre-March 2016 membership and the RPI indexation for up to 13 years prior. That's going to beat typical USS salary increases by a long way, no wonder the fund is in bad shape.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.