PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! However well-intentioned, for the safety of other users we ask that you refrain from seeking or offering medical advice. This includes recommendations for medicines, procedures or over-the-counter remedies. Posts or threads found to be in breach of this rule will be removed.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Aluminium pressure cooker bad for health?

Options
2»

Comments

  • ceridwen
    ceridwen Posts: 11,547 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kittie wrote: »
    everyone had aluminium saucepans when I was a child. Stainless steel pans only came about in approx the 1980-1990 era.

    also aluminium sulphate was/is used in the water supply system.

    http://www.dwrcymru.com/English/library/publications/Aluminium/English.pdf

    there was more aluminium in water in past years

    I don`t care if aluminium is proven to be linked or not. I am not going to ingest aluminium or any other chemicals if I can help it. Hence me using a filter for the past 30 years and eating organic.


    Right with you on that one kittie!

    The knowledge that something is health-hazardous always takes some time (often decades) before it filters through from the first people to be aware of it to a stage where "everyone and their cat" knows about it. Take asbestos for instance - the first people to be aware of it being unsafe were over 100 years ago - and yet other people were working with it in living memory (some of whom are still dying a slow death because of it at present). How come they STARTED working with it decades after the first people knew about it?

    The battles going on at present - because some of us know, but others arent yet aware - include G.M. food, irradiated food, microwaves, pylons, wireless networks (ie "this is a wireless zone" for use of laptops).
  • ceridwen wrote: »
    Right with you on that one kittie!

    The knowledge that something is health-hazardous always takes some time (often decades) before it filters through from the first people to be aware of it to a stage where "everyone and their cat" knows about it. Take asbestos for instance - the first people to be aware of it being unsafe were over 100 years ago - and yet other people were working with it in living memory (some of whom are still dying a slow death because of it at present). How come they STARTED working with it decades after the first people knew about it?

    The battles going on at present - because some of us know, but others arent yet aware - include G.M. food, irradiated food, microwaves, pylons, wireless networks (ie "this is a wireless zone" for use of laptops).

    And some things just aren't hazardous at all. None of the evidence at the moment points to aluminium being a real threat.

    As others have said, I'm prepared to take a (miniscule) risk with aluminium, and reduce known risks, such as excess salt, obesity, lack of exercise.

    Penny. x
    :rudolf: Sheep, pigs, hens and bees on our Teesdale smallholding :rudolf:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.