We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Advice on pay deductions

Hi, my partner has been working as a carer for around a year now whilst studying. This month he received an email with a letter attached stating that he had been put on a higher pay grade than he should have been, so therefore they will be deducting the extra money (roughly £1600) he was paid from his wages. 

I understand this is within the law, and we have set up a payment plan with the company, I just feel that it is completely immoral. I have very little knowledge on the subject and I was wondering if there any way at all that we could appeal this as he didn’t ask to be put on the higher pay rate, this was done automatically by management when first employed?
Thank you! 

Comments

  • ToxicWomble
    ToxicWomble Posts: 882 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper First Anniversary
    edited 10 November 2020 at 12:34PM
    Imagine he had been put on a lower grade and been under paid £1600
    Would he want to be paid back the error ?

    Mistakes happen
  • Was it something he should have been reasonably aware of, like they said ‘oh your pay is 20k p/a’ but his salary payments were equiv to 24k p/a?
  • Was it something he should have been reasonably aware of, like they said ‘oh your pay is 20k p/a’ but his salary payments were equiv to 24k p/a?
    Basically he is Swedish and submitted certificates of his qualifications which the deputy manager told him is equivalent to an NVQ Level 3, so therefore he was entitled to slightly more money each month. And now they are saying that the qualifications are not equivalent 
  • fran_l25 said:
    Was it something he should have been reasonably aware of, like they said ‘oh your pay is 20k p/a’ but his salary payments were equiv to 24k p/a?
    Basically he is Swedish and submitted certificates of his qualifications which the deputy manager told him is equivalent to an NVQ Level 3, so therefore he was entitled to slightly more money each month. And now they are saying that the qualifications are not equivalent 
    Again, is that something he would know? I wouldn't necessarily know what my quals equate to in Sweden, but i imagine if I wanted to work there Id need to find out? 
  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 19,451 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    fran_l25 said:
    I understand this is within the law, and we have set up a payment plan with the company, I just feel that it is completely immoral.  
    It is not immoral. A mistake has happened which needs to be corrected
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,847 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If he was in a union, it's possible they'd be able to help him argue for the validity / equivalence of his qualifications. 
    Signature removed for peace of mind
  • chrisbur
    chrisbur Posts: 4,299 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    fran_l25 said:
     and we have set up a payment plan with the company, 
    What kind of payment plan is this.  There needs to be some plan which takes account of the fact that some of this money was deducted as tax and NI.  A deduction from gross pay would be best, though even that needs to be checked as some manual adjustment might be needed for NI.
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,237 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think that he may be entitled to challenge it - if his qualifications and experience  were made clear to them and they paid him t a specific rate then I think that they might be able to argue that they have reconsidered and now wish to change the band he is on moving forward, I am not sure that they can claw it back if they offered it to him based on his qualifications. I'd suggest that he talks to ACAs or even an employment solicitor - a couple of hundred pounds for an initial meeting might be worth it to get £1,600 back,. If he knew or should have known that his qualifications were of a lower standard then it may be different, but if they knew what his skills and experience were and allocated him to one band then I think it is questionable whether they can retrospectively change that, particularly if he didn't know, and could not have reasonable known, that the banding was wrong. 
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • Dakta
    Dakta Posts: 585 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 13 November 2020 at 7:23PM
    I'm torn on this one. Mistakes do happen and with the shoe on the other foot (i.e in an underpaid scenario) I totally agree you'd want the difference.

    But, based on the face of it I would love to know how standardised these pay bands are. The question someone has already raised has has to be empthasised - would the employee have any reasonable way to know the pay band was wrong? Are the bands like an industry standard or did the job add offer varios grades. Was there any reasonable way you could know that the grade was wrong?

    Reason I say this is because whilst mistakes do happen  - and we need to sometimes imagine things from the employers point of view, what really is to stop any firm from saying 'look we shouldn't have valued your qualifications as much as we actually did, our apologies - in the interest of fairness do you mind backdating the difference?'

    I;m not suspecting foul play, but allowing a moment to be a cynic lots of companies could be waking up to their 'mistakes' right now.


  • I agree to the above. If it is proved to be a mistake at the time your partner started the job, unless you can demonstrate it was not a mistake, then it would be right and fair to correct it. I know someone who was told that the accounts calculated his allowance wrongly hence a deduction in his salary was made for a few months. Hence it can be confusing sometimes and mistakes happen. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.