🗳️ ELECTION 2024: THE MSE LEADERS' DEBATE Got a burning question you want us to ask the party leaders ahead of the general election? Post them on our dedicated Forum board where you can see and upvote other users' questions, or submit your suggestions via this form. Please note that the Forum's rules on avoiding general political discussion still apply across all boards.
Interview questions as reasonable adjustment
Options
Comments
-
I find this idea of an unfair advantage a strange one. Even with interview questions it would still not make it a level playing field for me. I still be would at a disadvantage even with the questions. It would not make it more likely for me to get a job over a neurotypical person, they would still have the upper hand but it would lessen the gap but not get rid of it. The idea that making certain adjustments puts non-disabled people at an advantage underestimates the difficulties and disadvantages that disabled people have.1
-
spectrum21 said:I find this idea of an unfair advantage a strange one. Even with interview questions it would still not make it a level playing field for me. I still be would at a disadvantage even with the questions. It would not make it more likely for me to get a job over a neurotypical person, they would still have the upper hand but it would lessen the gap but not get rid of it. The idea that making certain adjustments puts non-disabled people at an advantage underestimates the difficulties and disadvantages that disabled people have.1
-
unforeseen said:_shel said:I have epilepsy and associated cognitive problems. I always get interview questions in advance, usually local authority jobs. Never been questioned or denied as unfair advantage.
How is it unfair when I am at a disadvantage without it.
My experience of LA and public body interviews is that they err heavily on the side of tailoring for disabilities to prevent them being accused of discriminating. This does put those who do not identify as disabled at a disadvantage
The obvious way to get a proper level playing field would be for all candidates to receive the questions prior to interview.0 -
Comms69 said:spectrum21 said:I find this idea of an unfair advantage a strange one. Even with interview questions it would still not make it a level playing field for me. I still be would at a disadvantage even with the questions. It would not make it more likely for me to get a job over a neurotypical person, they would still have the upper hand but it would lessen the gap but not get rid of it. The idea that making certain adjustments puts non-disabled people at an advantage underestimates the difficulties and disadvantages that disabled people have.1
-
_shel said:unforeseen said:_shel said:I have epilepsy and associated cognitive problems. I always get interview questions in advance, usually local authority jobs. Never been questioned or denied as unfair advantage.
How is it unfair when I am at a disadvantage without it.
My experience of LA and public body interviews is that they err heavily on the side of tailoring for disabilities to prevent them being accused of discriminating. This does put those who do not identify as disabled at a disadvantage
The obvious way to get a proper level playing field would be for all candidates to receive the questions prior to interview.1 -
I've had interviews where they have thrown some complete curve balls in that really put me on the back foot. I'm not sure it would be fair for someone to recieve the questions before hand to allow them to prepare. Just because someone is neuro typical does not mean that they find interviews easy.
At work we are given broad headings of what the questions will focus on.
I think a more reasonable adjustment would be additional time to allow you to go through your notes.
My next interview is this week, as it will be done by Skype and not video enabled, I can feel more confident about having notes and prompts in front of me, whereas I'd never take these into an interview as I know some interviewers look down on this approach.Make £2023 in 2023 (#36) £3479.30/£2023
Make £2024 in 2024...1 -
spectrum21 said:Comms69 said:spectrum21 said:I find this idea of an unfair advantage a strange one. Even with interview questions it would still not make it a level playing field for me. I still be would at a disadvantage even with the questions. It would not make it more likely for me to get a job over a neurotypical person, they would still have the upper hand but it would lessen the gap but not get rid of it. The idea that making certain adjustments puts non-disabled people at an advantage underestimates the difficulties and disadvantages that disabled people have.
Unknown questions test comprehension, ability to perform under changing dynamics and ability to think on your feet. The content of your answer is largely irrelevant in many way.
I don't need an understanding of medical conditions as the question is regarding employment. You would have an unfair advantage the same way if you were given your exam papers two days before taking them... Which strangely is not seen as reasonable2 -
In many organisations I’ve held jobs they wouldn’t be able to provide upfront questions because they could change for each candidate, they may be asked based around your CV, asked on the back of another answer or maybe something they decide to ask that one particular candidate. So I suppose they could of give them up front but they would be subject to change.1
-
Being allowed extra time on a test is a long established adjustment. So being given extra time on the interview by having the questions a bit in advance in a waiting room would seem to be very much along those lines.
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll1 -
theoretica said:Being allowed extra time on a test is a long established adjustment. So being given extra time on the interview by having the questions a bit in advance in a waiting room would seem to be very much along those lines.
A reasonable adjustment would be allowing someone more time to consider their answer without negatively marking their score.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 11 Election 2024: The MSE Leaders' Debate
- 343.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 450K Spending & Discounts
- 236.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 609.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.4K Life & Family
- 248.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards