We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pension Cashflow Retirement Planner - Key Info?
Comments
-
Thrugelmir said:Never before have so many countries entered a recession at once. Historical data is going to need some updating.0
-
GSP said:Thrugelmir said:Never before have so many countries entered a recession at once. Historical data is going to need some updating.0
-
GSP said:coyrls said:There have been a large number of studies on safe withdrawal rates based on historical data. You are unlikely to improve on the existing literature by canvasing opinions on what returns might be in the future.
Not sure where I read it, but there were suggestions the SWR 4% rule was not considered fit for purpose anymore.
0 -
Thrugelmir said:GSP said:BritishInvestor said:Thrugelmir said:Never before have so many countries entered a recession at once. Historical data is going to need some updating.
1. Falling markets over a long period
2. Inflation
and times such as 1915-1920 and the 1970s were pretty tough- 1915 and 1920, UK inflation (CPI) averaged 17% a year. This means prices rose 103% in six years.
- 1973 to 1978, UK inflation (CPI) averaged 15%, which means that in six years prices rose a whopping 110%!
https://www.timelineapp.co/blog/no-qe-didnt-break-the-4-rule/
You could of course be correct, but if we do have to update historical data it's going to be an extraordinarily tough time for all of us. Personally, I'm an optimist
If you like heavyweight technical reads. Can recommend this oneThis Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly
by Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff0 -
GSP said:coyrls said:There have been a large number of studies on safe withdrawal rates based on historical data. You are unlikely to improve on the existing literature by canvasing opinions on what returns might be in the future.
Not sure where I read it, but there were suggestions the SWR 4% rule was not considered fit for purpose anymore.
1 -
coyrls said:GSP said:coyrls said:There have been a large number of studies on safe withdrawal rates based on historical data. You are unlikely to improve on the existing literature by canvasing opinions on what returns might be in the future.
Not sure where I read it, but there were suggestions the SWR 4% rule was not considered fit for purpose anymore.
0 -
Looking at my FA’s ‘quick & dirty‘ planner, he has used a real return of 1% for forty years. Every year for the next forty years my numbers go down anywhere between £20k and £35k until it runs out when I am 94. Does this seem sound? Does anyone have a very ball park run of returns. Thanks0
-
As an accountant I do lots of cash flow forecasts. The only thing that is consistent among them is that reality and forecasts diverge as time goes on. What do you, GSP, think is going to happen to taxation in the next couple of years, as the country has to pay for COVID support? What’s going to happen to public expenditure after the next general election? And the one after that? And the one after that? What’s going to happen in the USA after the next general election? And what if North Korea does develop the capability of delivering a nuclear multiple warhead missile to anywhere in the west? And that’s just the next few years, let alone few decades. All these things will affect returns.
Past performance is not a guide to future returns ... etc, etc, etc.
1%? Who knows. It’s back to that crystal ball.0 -
Steve_PL_too said:As an accountant I do lots of cash flow forecasts. The only thing that is consistent among them is that reality and forecasts diverge as time goes on. What do you, GSP, think is going to happen to taxation in the next couple of years, as the country has to pay for COVID support? What’s going to happen to public expenditure after the next general election? And the one after that? And the one after that? What’s going to happen in the USA after the next general election? And what if North Korea does develop the capability of delivering a nuclear multiple warhead missile to anywhere in the west? And that’s just the next few years, let alone few decades. All these things will affect returns.
Past performance is not a guide to future returns ... etc, etc, etc.
1%? Who knows. It’s back to that crystal ball.0 -
GSP said:coyrls said:GSP said:coyrls said:There have been a large number of studies on safe withdrawal rates based on historical data. You are unlikely to improve on the existing literature by canvasing opinions on what returns might be in the future.
Not sure where I read it, but there were suggestions the SWR 4% rule was not considered fit for purpose anymore.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards