We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New Solar PV Installation

Options
13

Comments

  • JKenH
    JKenH Posts: 5,129 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    scorp_a said:
    Anyone using SOFAR inverter? Not sure if this is better/worse than Solis.


    When my panels were installed a couple of years ago I had 2 Sofar inverters. I had a lot of problems with tripping out first thing in the morning as the panels woke up. The installer replaced them with Solis and that cured the problem. I also found the Solis inverters woke up earlier than the Sofar.

    As far as IBoost is concerned, mine has paid for itself in a couple of years but I don’t have gas and one of my two hot water tanks is heated solely by electricity and both are very well insulated. I think in calculating the saving on water heating costs you should, as others have suggested, base it on the cheapest alternative cost of heating water, not base it on daytime electricity rates unless you have no alternative. Also take into account the time you use the water. If your biggest demand is early morning you will need to take into account overnight losses (potentially 25%). If early evening use then your storage losses will be minimal.
    Northern Lincolnshire. 7.8 kWp system, (4.2 kw west facing panels , 3.6 kw east facing), Solis inverters, Solar IBoost water heater, Mitsubishi SRK35ZS-S and SRK20ZS-S Wall Mounted Inverter Heat Pumps, ex Nissan Leaf owner)
  • Hexane
    Hexane Posts: 522 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    While I appreciate this website is a principally a money saving tool, accelerated global warming is clearly demonstrating it is a threat to the very existance of human life on this planet so making judgements based purely on economics and ignoring sustainability could be considered short sighted at best and maybe even reckless otherwise. 
    That's fair enough, so long as installers providing quotes with an iBoost include a disclaimer for houses that also have gas central heating, saying "included in this quote is a device that is guaranteed to lose you money, it is included to avoid making judgements based purely on economics and ignoring sustainability."

    The cost/savings/earnings breakdowns that I'm sure all installers still include, should also note that for every kWh "saved" by the iBoost, the household will be losing out on 5.5p (or whatever the going rate) that could have been earned by selling that kWh.
    We don't have iboost but certainly something to be considered as it's especially useful in the shoulder and winter months.

    Not the case for me, the similar device installed here is most useful in the summer and shoulder months, it's of very little use in winter.

    7.25 kWp PV system (4.1kW WSW & 3.15kW ENE), Solis inverter, myenergi eddi & harvi for energy diversion to immersion heater. myenergi hub for Virtual Power Plant demand-side response trial.
  • Wow! That sounds a great deal, you must be a tough negotiator. Reckon somebody should sign you up to assist with Brexit negotiations. ;)
    Will keep fingers crossed for you that the DNO play ball.
    East coast, lat 51.97. 8.26kw SSE, 23° pitch + 0.59kw WSW vertical. Nissan Leaf plus Zappi charger and 2 x ASHP's. Givenergy 8.2 & 9.5 kWh batts, 2 x 3 kW ac inverters. Indra V2H . CoCharger Host, Interest in Ripple Energy & Abundance.
  • Solarchaser
    Solarchaser Posts: 1,758 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hexane said:
    While I appreciate this website is a principally a money saving tool, accelerated global warming is clearly demonstrating it is a threat to the very existance of human life on this planet so making judgements based purely on economics and ignoring sustainability could be considered short sighted at best and maybe even reckless otherwise. 
    That's fair enough, so long as installers providing quotes with an iBoost include a disclaimer for houses that also have gas central heating, saying "included in this quote is a device that is guaranteed to lose you money, it is included to avoid making judgements based purely on economics and ignoring sustainability."

    The cost/savings/earnings breakdowns that I'm sure all installers still include, should also note that for every kWh "saved" by the iBoost, the household will be losing out on 5.5p (or whatever the going rate) that could have been earned by selling that kWh.
    We don't have iboost but certainly something to be considered as it's especially useful in the shoulder and winter months.

    Not the case for me, the similar device installed here is most useful in the summer and shoulder months, it's of very little use in winter.

    I commend your moral crusade there, but you base your absolute statement on the assumption that all electricity providers will pay this 5.5p export , as far as I'm aware there are only a few power companies doing this?
    West central Scotland
    4kw sse since 2014 and 6.6kw wsw / ene split since 2019
    24kwh leaf, 75Kwh Tesla and Lux 3600 with 60Kwh storage
  • scorp_a
    scorp_a Posts: 15 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Btw, I got quotes from eon, eec, ecocetra and forever-green. I am going with forever- green based in Cheltenham.
  • Petriix
    Petriix Posts: 2,296 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Hexane said:
    While I appreciate this website is a principally a money saving tool, accelerated global warming is clearly demonstrating it is a threat to the very existance of human life on this planet so making judgements based purely on economics and ignoring sustainability could be considered short sighted at best and maybe even reckless otherwise. 
    That's fair enough, so long as installers providing quotes with an iBoost include a disclaimer for houses that also have gas central heating, saying "included in this quote is a device that is guaranteed to lose you money, it is included to avoid making judgements based purely on economics and ignoring sustainability."

    The cost/savings/earnings breakdowns that I'm sure all installers still include, should also note that for every kWh "saved" by the iBoost, the household will be losing out on 5.5p (or whatever the going rate) that could have been earned by selling that kWh.
    We don't have iboost but certainly something to be considered as it's especially useful in the shoulder and winter months.

    Not the case for me, the similar device installed here is most useful in the summer and shoulder months, it's of very little use in winter.

    I commend your moral crusade there, but you base your absolute statement on the assumption that all electricity providers will pay this 5.5p export , as far as I'm aware there are only a few power companies doing this?
    It would be quite a costly choice to go with a supplier paying significantly less than that 5.5p rate and hardly rational justification for wasting money on an uneconomical diverter.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.