We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Which Multi-Asset Fund for drawdown?
Comments
-
Any suggestions as to a medium to higher risk multi-asset fund please?
What is your definition of medium to higher risk? One persons low risk is another persons high risk - so some context is needed. e..g how much are you prepared for it to fall in any 12 month period? 30%, 40%, 50% etc?
Presume risk/volatility will usually increase with the proportion of equities.Not necessarily but its a broad guide. For example, your equities could be higher risk in selection (emerging markets, smaller cos, focus on higher volatility sectors etc). So, those would push the risk up even if the equity ratio is the same as one that has lower risk equities.
Equally, the risk reduction assets are not all one level. If the fund is using cash or gilts (not index linked) as risk reducers those are lower risk than corp bonds, global bonds or high yield bonds (and others). So, again, the ratio may not indicate the real risks.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
Here is a link to a comparison table of low cost multi asset funds: It is not just about % equity, there are other differences.
https://monevator.com/passive-fund-of-funds-the-rivals/
1 -
I would learn about specific risks and then evaluate your personal position. After that I would select asset allocation.If you are not prepared to invest a bit of time, the standard/traditional balanced allocation is 60/40 equity to bonds. Something like VLS 60 would be a decent choice.1
-
The ones that come to mind would be the MyMap, HSBC Global Strategy, Vanguard Lifestrategy ranges (all have different products suitable to your chosen risk level). You can do a search on most forums where people compare them.1
-
What funds are you currently invested in, & how have they performed for you?JamesP8 said:I am currently reviewing initial fund(s) to select for an imminent DIY drawdown (Aviva). Any suggestions as to a medium to higher risk multi-asset fund please? Presume risk/volatility will usually increase with the proportion of equities. Hoping to average 5% or more annual gross return over 5 years.
I'm with Aviva (I know they have MANY different pensions) with a membersite, and it allows the same funds I was in pre-drawdown to continue post-drawdown.
I am tempted to maintain the same funds as I move towards that - they have served me well for the past 15 years (with the occasional tweak)..Plan for tomorrow, enjoy today!0 -
I think 5 years is too short a timescale to be confident of averaging 5% annual return for any risk level. If there is a equity crash during that period which takes a year or two to recover from, then the return could be a lot lower over that 5 year period, but could still average around 5% over say 20 years or more.JamesP8 said:Hoping to average 5% or more annual gross return over 5 years.1 -
Plus the OP should have a cash fund of at least two years income to tide over any bad year(s) in the market .2
-
You might find some ideas here https://citywire.co.uk/funds-insider/sector/aggressive-gbp-funds/i2698/?periodMonths=60&page=1&expandedList=trueI don't care about your first world problems; I have enough of my own!1
-
Bond or equity markets?Albermarle said:Plus the OP should have a cash fund of at least two years income to tide over any bad year(s) in the market .0 -
Love the word “surely”. You cannot be serious.Mickey666 said:
If it’s a managed fund then surely the fund manager(s) would rebalance the fund to move away from equities if there was such a crash? Isn’t that the point of a managed fund?Audaxer said:
I think 5 years is too short a timescale to be confident of averaging 5% annual return for any risk level. If there is a equity crash during that period which takes a year or two to recover from, then the return could be a lot lower over that 5 year period, but could still average around 5% over say 20 years or more.JamesP8 said:Hoping to average 5% or more annual gross return over 5 years.Also “rebalancing” does not mean what you think it means.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
