We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
"Self Employed" due to shareholding in company - despite salaried by Employer..help!!
[Deleted User]
Posts: 0 Newbie
Hi there
Haven't posted on here before but wanted to just see if anyone had answers.
We are in the process of a mortgage application with Metro Bank and have been for the last 30 days so far. The latest thing that they have flagged is that my partner is classed as Self Employed - simply because he is a Director with more than 25% shareholding. He does not take company dividends and he is salaried with a contract in place.
This would be fine but the company has only been around for 11 months and the lender has asked for 2 years proof of accounts. Obviously, they do not have these because of how long they have been registered. He has spoken to the accountant and they have suggested that they could reduce his shareholding OR provide projected accounts.
I am obviously worried about this as it is making me doubt the process now. Does anyone have any suggestions? If people have been in this position before? If the accountant provides proof that he has reduced shareholding, or if she provided projected accounts? Would this work?
Panic mode.
Thank you!
Haven't posted on here before but wanted to just see if anyone had answers.
We are in the process of a mortgage application with Metro Bank and have been for the last 30 days so far. The latest thing that they have flagged is that my partner is classed as Self Employed - simply because he is a Director with more than 25% shareholding. He does not take company dividends and he is salaried with a contract in place.
This would be fine but the company has only been around for 11 months and the lender has asked for 2 years proof of accounts. Obviously, they do not have these because of how long they have been registered. He has spoken to the accountant and they have suggested that they could reduce his shareholding OR provide projected accounts.
I am obviously worried about this as it is making me doubt the process now. Does anyone have any suggestions? If people have been in this position before? If the accountant provides proof that he has reduced shareholding, or if she provided projected accounts? Would this work?
Panic mode.
Thank you!
0
Comments
-
Presumably, you applied direct? It's common knowledge in the industry ownership of 25% of the business will see you treated as self-employed by pretty much the entire market so this is an unlikely broker error. I suspect Metro won't accept this case and it would be prudent to look for lenders happy to accept one year self-employed applications.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
-
kingstreet said:Presumably, you applied direct? It's common knowledge in the industry ownership of 25% of the business will see you treated as self-employed by pretty much the entire market so this is an unlikely broker error. I suspect Metro won't accept this case and it would be prudent to look for lenders happy to accept one year self-employed applications.Hi there
No we applied with a broker (with a lot of experience) but he didn’t foresee them asking because he is Salaried. So even if he changes his shareholding, or obtains projected accounts they’ll say no?
we can’t go with another lender. Too far down the line unfortunately and 90% LTV0 -
The latest thing that they have flagged is that my partner is classed as Self Employed - simply because he is a Director with more than 25% shareholding. He does not take company dividends and he is salaried with a contract in place.
Yep. That is a common position when the shareholding is 25% or above.
This would be fine but the company has only been around for 11 months and the lender has asked for 2 years proof of accounts. Obviously, they do not have these because of how long they have been registered. He has spoken to the accountant and they have suggested that they could reduce his shareholding OR provide projected accounts.It would be better to ask the lender what they want given the short history.If the accountant provides proof that he has reduced shareholding, or if she provided projected accounts?Reducing the shareholding means he owns less of the company. So, misses out on future value and voting power.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
