We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can't get IFA advice to transfer a small DB pension short of 12% fee. Ideas?

timmillea
Posts: 13 Forumite

I am 18 months off being 55. I have tried for 3 years - every time the 3 months 'free transfer window' opens - to transfer my small (£36 pw at age 67) DB Universities Superannuation Scheme pension to a DC pension, without success. Short of the quoted 'industry standard minimum' £5,000 fee for FCA-compliant advice - which amounts to almost 12% of the entire CETV. I refuse to be a victim of the next financial mis-selling scandal.
I have studied FCA ps20-06 (new regs coming in 1st October) and there is not one mention of means tested benefits, Pension Credit or the like. It is a document regulating the rich industry interested only in rich clients.
As things stand, my USS pension will be wholly absorbed by means-tested state benefits, i.e. it will be worthless, apart from the meagre lump-sum, at around 8% of the current CETV. The FCA regulations to FAs are for me to lose 92% of the value of my pension and have plenty of calculations and tables to show why this is right and I am wrong. Ther is no discussion possible with them except to explain to me in idiot terms why I am wrong and that state benefits are not relevant.
As the CETV is over £30k, I am required by law to obtain advice to transfer, even though I know the narrow FCA regulations are not to.
I am in the position of having to surrender 12% of my pension to an adviser who I will ignore and then have a very limited selection of schemes who are prepared to receive a transfer without positive advice.
The FCA seems to swap one mis-selling scandal for another yet always protects the financial professionals.
Exhausted this season and I only have one season left.. It has been a very long 3 months. Any creative ideas would be most welcome.
I have studied FCA ps20-06 (new regs coming in 1st October) and there is not one mention of means tested benefits, Pension Credit or the like. It is a document regulating the rich industry interested only in rich clients.
As things stand, my USS pension will be wholly absorbed by means-tested state benefits, i.e. it will be worthless, apart from the meagre lump-sum, at around 8% of the current CETV. The FCA regulations to FAs are for me to lose 92% of the value of my pension and have plenty of calculations and tables to show why this is right and I am wrong. Ther is no discussion possible with them except to explain to me in idiot terms why I am wrong and that state benefits are not relevant.
As the CETV is over £30k, I am required by law to obtain advice to transfer, even though I know the narrow FCA regulations are not to.
I am in the position of having to surrender 12% of my pension to an adviser who I will ignore and then have a very limited selection of schemes who are prepared to receive a transfer without positive advice.
The FCA seems to swap one mis-selling scandal for another yet always protects the financial professionals.
Exhausted this season and I only have one season left.. It has been a very long 3 months. Any creative ideas would be most welcome.
_______________________
"Everything is relative"
"Everything is relative"
0
Comments
-
If the "professionals" wanted your business don't you think that the price would be more competitive? No one is forcing you to transfer either. Any scandal would be most likely self inflicted.0
-
timmillea said:I am 18 months off being 55. I have tried for 3 years - every time the 3 months 'free transfer window' opens - to transfer my small (£36 pw at age 67) DB Universities Superannuation Scheme pension to a DC pension, without success. Short of the quoted 'industry standard minimum' £5,000 fee for FCA-compliant advice - which amounts to almost 12% of the entire CETV. I refuse to be a victim of the next financial mis-selling scandal.timmillea said:As things stand, my USS pension will be wholly absorbed by means-tested state benefits, i.e. it will be worthless, apart from the meagre lump-sum, at around 8% of the current CETV.
Why should the taxpayer support you if you are able to contribute to your own maintenance? You are also overlooking the fact that many benefits are tested against the pension you could draw from a DC arrangement if you chose to do so.
Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!3 -
Short of the quoted 'industry standard minimum' £5,000 fee for FCA-compliant advice - which amounts to almost 12% of the entire CETV. I refuse to be a victim of the next financial mis-selling scandal.
£5000 is not industry standard. However, it is in the ballpark of what you expect to see for a reasonable fee. Yet you seem to want to be a victim.
I have studied FCA ps20-06 (new regs coming in 1st October) and there is not one mention of means tested benefits, Pension Credit or the like. It is a document regulating the rich industry interested only in rich clients.Generally, you have to have a fair bit of alternative wealth to be able to afford to transfer out of a DB scheme. So, that is not unexpected.As things stand, my USS pension will be wholly absorbed by means-tested state benefits, i.e. it will be worthlessThat isnt how means tested benefits work. And transferring the pension will not prevent the DC pension from being included in the means test.As the CETV is over £30k, I am required by law to obtain advice to transfer, even though I know the narrow FCA regulations are not to.Historically, 9 out of 10 people are best left in the DB scheme and not transferred. That figure has changed in recent times due to low gilt yields but it is corect that most people are best staying put. It is possible to argue that the FCA is a bit out of touch with some of its views but it is not unreasonable position.I am in the position of having to surrender 12% of my pension to an adviser who I will ignore and then have a very limited selection of schemes who are prepared to receive a transfer without positive advice.Which just indicates how much of a risk you are asking all of them to take.The FCA seems to swap one mis-selling scandal for another yet always protects the financial professionals.The FCA are trying to prevent a scandal. And it certainly does not protect financial professionals. Many are going out of business or suffering massive costs just to keep going. Even those that have never transacted in DB pension transfers are suffering massive cost increases.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.3 -
timmillea said:I am 18 months off being 55. I have tried for 3 years - every time the 3 months 'free transfer window' opens - to transfer my small (£36 pw at age 67) DB Universities Superannuation Scheme pension to a DC pension, without success. Short of the quoted 'industry standard minimum' £5,000 fee for FCA-compliant advice - which amounts to almost 12% of the entire CETV. I refuse to be a victim of the next financial mis-selling scandal.
I have studied FCA ps20-06 (new regs coming in 1st October) and there is not one mention of means tested benefits, Pension Credit or the like. It is a document regulating the rich industry interested only in rich clients.
As things stand, my USS pension will be wholly absorbed by means-tested state benefits, i.e. it will be worthless, apart from the meagre lump-sum, at around 8% of the current CETV. The FCA regulations to FAs are for me to lose 92% of the value of my pension and have plenty of calculations and tables to show why this is right and I am wrong. Ther is no discussion possible with them except to explain to me in idiot terms why I am wrong and that state benefits are not relevant.
As the CETV is over £30k, I am required by law to obtain advice to transfer, even though I know the narrow FCA regulations are not to.
I am in the position of having to surrender 12% of my pension to an adviser who I will ignore and then have a very limited selection of schemes who are prepared to receive a transfer without positive advice.
The FCA seems to swap one mis-selling scandal for another yet always protects the financial professionals.
Exhausted this season and I only have one season left.. It has been a very long 3 months. Any creative ideas would be most welcome.0 -
Are you sure that you would be in line for pension credit anyway?
Have you obtained a state pension forecast?
https://www.gov.uk/check-state-pension
0 -
timmillea said:I am 18 months off being 55. I have tried for 3 years - every time the 3 months 'free transfer window' opens - to transfer my small (£36 pw at age 67) DB Universities Superannuation Scheme pension to a DC pension, without success. Short of the quoted 'industry standard minimum' £5,000 fee for FCA-compliant advice - which amounts to almost 12% of the entire CETV. I refuse to be a victim of the next financial mis-selling scandal.
I have studied FCA ps20-06 (new regs coming in 1st October) and there is not one mention of means tested benefits, Pension Credit or the like. It is a document regulating the rich industry interested only in rich clients.
As things stand, my USS pension will be wholly absorbed by means-tested state benefits, i.e. it will be worthless, apart from the meagre lump-sum, at around 8% of the current CETV. The FCA regulations to FAs are for me to lose 92% of the value of my pension and have plenty of calculations and tables to show why this is right and I am wrong. Ther is no discussion possible with them except to explain to me in idiot terms why I am wrong and that state benefits are not relevant.
As the CETV is over £30k, I am required by law to obtain advice to transfer, even though I know the narrow FCA regulations are not to.
I am in the position of having to surrender 12% of my pension to an adviser who I will ignore and then have a very limited selection of schemes who are prepared to receive a transfer without positive advice.
The FCA seems to swap one mis-selling scandal for another yet always protects the financial professionals.
Exhausted this season and I only have one season left.. It has been a very long 3 months. Any creative ideas would be most welcome.
And second, even if you have to pay the £5k, according to your calculations, isn't that still worth it to get your money out if the alternative is leaving it in?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards