We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Company Pension Contributions
Comments
-
Thanks Shaun,
I'm fast coming to that conclusion. It seems odd that it's all subjuctive and down to the interpretation of the local tax office. I hope I don't have to call a few different ones until I get an answer I like then move to that area!0 -
I spoke to the business helpline and they promptly directed me towards the pension helpline who directed me back to the business helpline.
Anyway, I was eventually directed to BIM46000-46198. It would appear that company contributions are indeed subject to relief from CGT up to £225kpa as long as they are “wholly and exclusively” for business use”. It is this phrase that confused me as to it’s true meaning.
From what I can gleam from the BIM pages and conversations with HMRC, it would appear that it means that the total remuneration must be appropriate for the role fulfilled. I assume that means that if you employed your wife for 1 hour a week and paid her £10, that’s OK. But, if you also paid £50pa into a pension scheme then that would be disallowed. As I’m the only employee and generate the entire turnover then I can’t see any issues there. I’m also wondering if I could use this to my advantage in terms of justifying a small salary as the “Total Remuneration” is still representative and any profit can then be justifiably be taken in dividends.
Isn’t this supposed to be “Simplified”?0 -
A good point!
However in defence of the ""A Day" changes overall there were quite a few good changes and in general there was simplification.There were around 17 pension regimes and now there is around 1! So a benefit there.
Some areas like employer contributions were left vague. I think that in classic New Labour terms they love making things difficult to employ plenty of bureaucrats and lawyers! Frankly I know that politicians do not understand the value of their own pension pots and nor do civil servants. If it really came to it I would ask to value their pension!
If its any consolation the mess around ASPs is much worse. Rules were introduced on A Day to allow a type of drawdown to continue after 75. The rules have been changed twice since. I have someone who wants to use ASP but I am recommending against as they keep changing the rules in more punitive fashion and so who can say what it will be like in 5/10 years time?I am an Independent Financial Adviser. For regulated individuals like me there are rules on giving financial advice. Therefore any posts I make are meant to be helpful but are not financial advice.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards