We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Company Pension Contributions

2»

Comments

  • MickKnipfler
    MickKnipfler Posts: 1,983 Forumite
    Thanks Shaun,

    I'm fast coming to that conclusion. It seems odd that it's all subjuctive and down to the interpretation of the local tax office. I hope I don't have to call a few different ones until I get an answer I like then move to that area!
  • MickKnipfler
    MickKnipfler Posts: 1,983 Forumite
    I spoke to the business helpline and they promptly directed me towards the pension helpline who directed me back to the business helpline.

    Anyway, I was eventually directed to BIM46000-46198. It would appear that company contributions are indeed subject to relief from CGT up to £225kpa as long as they are “wholly and exclusively” for business use”. It is this phrase that confused me as to it’s true meaning.

    From what I can gleam from the BIM pages and conversations with HMRC, it would appear that it means that the total remuneration must be appropriate for the role fulfilled. I assume that means that if you employed your wife for 1 hour a week and paid her £10, that’s OK. But, if you also paid £50pa into a pension scheme then that would be disallowed. As I’m the only employee and generate the entire turnover then I can’t see any issues there. I’m also wondering if I could use this to my advantage in terms of justifying a small salary as the “Total Remuneration” is still representative and any profit can then be justifiably be taken in dividends.

    Isn’t this supposed to be “Simplified”?
  • shaunrc
    shaunrc Posts: 207 Forumite
    A good point!

    However in defence of the ""A Day" changes overall there were quite a few good changes and in general there was simplification.There were around 17 pension regimes and now there is around 1! So a benefit there.

    Some areas like employer contributions were left vague. I think that in classic New Labour terms they love making things difficult to employ plenty of bureaucrats and lawyers! Frankly I know that politicians do not understand the value of their own pension pots and nor do civil servants. If it really came to it I would ask to value their pension!

    If its any consolation the mess around ASPs is much worse. Rules were introduced on A Day to allow a type of drawdown to continue after 75. The rules have been changed twice since. I have someone who wants to use ASP but I am recommending against as they keep changing the rules in more punitive fashion and so who can say what it will be like in 5/10 years time?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser. For regulated individuals like me there are rules on giving financial advice. Therefore any posts I make are meant to be helpful but are not financial advice.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 241.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 618.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.1K Life & Family
  • 254.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.