We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Any disadvantage taking multiple tax free amounts from SIPP with Flexi drawdown

I have £200k in SIPP with ii.  I do not need to take the full 25% tax free lump sum initially, but I am concerned taking say 2x 12.5% lump sums may be detrimental. The concern arose when ii said I do not need to sell any funds moving into drawdown - so it appears if SIPP & drawdown investments are not segregated.
Here is a scenario that explains my concern (an optimist 10% growth pa assumed)
1. SIPP is £200k and take £25k tax free which moves £75k into flexi drawdown. Leaving £100k in the SIPP. So I have taken 50% of my tax free allowance
2. take £10k each year for say 3 years so flexidrawn is now £63.4k. The SIPP part would have grown to £133.1k. But as the investments not segregated the individual figures would not be known.
3 I now want to take the rest of the tax free cash. My calculation is 
- Total fund (SIPP + draw) is £196.5k. So 50% of that is £98.25k, giving a tax free lump sum of £24.6k
Which is disappointing because If the SIPP funds were segregated the tax free lump sum would be 25% of £133.1k = £33.3k 

Comments

  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,563 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Your calculations are wrong, it'll make no difference whether segregated or not.
    After 1. before growth you'll have 57.1% uncrystallised, not 50%. 100/175.
    If you take out taxed income, that'll increase the uncrystallised % more, as you're reducing the crystallised part.

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 29,294 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    The % figure mentioned will be visible to you on the ii website .
  • zagfles said:
    Your calculations are wrong, it'll make no difference whether segregated or not.
    After 1. before growth you'll have 57.1% uncrystallised, not 50%. 100/175.
    If you take out taxed income, that'll increase the uncrystallised % more, as you're reducing the crystallised part.

    Thanks. I was hoping I was wrong!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.