We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Duplicate thread- please ignore
del1rious
Posts: 30 Forumite
Hello all
as per advice on this forum, correspondence from SABA parking was ignored for a period of 6 months. Then a request was made for them to remove all personal data. Interestingly, the below response was received
“Unfortunately, even though the 6 months has passed, cases such as these can be pursued through the County Court with a 6 year statutory limitation period. Therefore, we would have legitimate grounds to retain the data for the period of time for which a claim could be made.
as per advice on this forum, correspondence from SABA parking was ignored for a period of 6 months. Then a request was made for them to remove all personal data. Interestingly, the below response was received
“Unfortunately, even though the 6 months has passed, cases such as these can be pursued through the County Court with a 6 year statutory limitation period. Therefore, we would have legitimate grounds to retain the data for the period of time for which a claim could be made.
As well as this, the notice remains active and the balance outstanding. Therefore we are unable to remove your data from our system whilst money is still owed and the case remains open.”
My thinking is that this is a load of nonsense as County Court if for a civil pursuit- not criminal as is with the bylaws/magistrates process. I have queried this point but welcomed further views?
Thanks!
0
Comments
-
Is this related to your earlier thread?
If so then please copy your post above as a reply on that thread.
Then edit your post above, and the thread title, to read something like duplicate thread - please ignore.2 -
Thanks! Have done soKeithP said:Is this related to your earlier thread?
If so then please copy your post above as a reply on that thread.
Then edit your post above, and the thread title, to read something like duplicate thread - please ignore.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards