We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Legal action
Comments
-
It sounds as though your contract included a restrictive covenant- whether or not it would be enforceable will depend on the exact terms, and how reasonable they are when seen in the context of your role, the nature of the business etc.
So, for instance, a covenant limiting your right to work for a competitor within a certain geographical area near your old employer might be harder to challenge than one which limited your right to work anywhere in the country, for example. However, it will depend on the specific circumstances- the same terms might be reasonable and enforceable for one job and not for another, depending on what the job Is in each case.
If they sue you and the covenant is upheld they could claim from you for their legal costs and any financial losses they suffer due to Any customers moving with you to your new employer.
It sounds as though you need to get your own legal advice ASAP.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0 -
Just to add, as this question comes up a lot (along with why do I have to honour my 3 month notice) the time to question a contract term is when you are negotiating to join the company. As above, these are often difficult to enforce but not impossible and there are cases, particularly in sales, where action is succesfully taken. 12 months sounds restricitive though - best answer as others have said is lawyer up - you could ask your employer to step in, but you do risk them letting you go.0
-
Does your new employer impose a similar restriction?
0 -
What was your role?
A 12 month restrictive covenant is extremely long. If it is deemed to be unreasonably long, the whole clause is not legally enforceable. The courts are only prepared to enforce a 12 month non-compete clause in pretty extreme circumstances - e.g. where you were the CEO of the company. Even 3 month or 6 month restrictions come under a lot of restriction.
I suspect you could take the position that the restrictive covenant is not enforceable.
Is there anything you could sue your former employer over? If so, threatening to issue proceedings for that (or issuing proceedings them settling them) could also be a good strategy.0 -
Just a salesperson nothing special. Plenty of people have moved and joined competitors I can name at least 10 with the same contract!0
-
I'm already working for new employer so not sure how that affects things0
-
As you were just a sales person, I think you can be fairly comfortable that a 12 month non-compete clause is not legally enforceable.
The question then becomes how you deal with your employer's letters. I would be tempted to either not respond, or respond simply saying that the non-compete is unreasonable in scope and unreasonable in duration and hence is not legally enforceable. You could state that if legal proceedings are issued you will be seeking your costs from the employer in the usual way.1 -
Hi Steampowered, i have just sent you a PM0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards