We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

4 pensions into 1 ? (analysis of funds and ongoing charges)

hi
i have 4 pensions with the oldest dating back to 1997.
they've all remained untouched from the day they were taken out, apart from things beyond my control like pension provider transfer.
i think it's about time (and well overdue!) i started looking at them in detail as i intend to start taking from them in 11yrs (at 55), so want to make sure they're doing the best they can be in that period.
i'm going to look at 3 things;
are there better funds i could/should transfer into? (almost certainly)
are there cheaper providers? (definitely i would think!)
finally should i combine all 4 into one pot?
...................................................................................
circa £31k - aviva portfolio (54% liontrust sustainable future managed s6 / 46% bny mellon multi-asset growth s6)  - overall charge 0.97% 
circa £24k  - scottish widows - adventurous (60% SW SSgA 50:50 Global Equity Index Fund, 22% bond, 18% property) - overall charge 0.39%
circa £29k - clerical medical (now scottish widows) - unsure on the funds on this one (need to dig out paperwork)       - overall charge 1.25% (ish)
circa £38k - aviva (was friends life) - unsure on funds but has a minimum 3% growth guarantee                               - overall charge is a fixed amount about £44pa
......................................................................................................................
any advice/thoughts/observations welcome! thank you :)



Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,653 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    i think it's about time (and well overdue!) i started looking at them in detail as i intend to start taking from them in 11yrs (at 55), 

    That will not be possible.  The minimum age will not be 55 at that point as it is going up in 2028 to 57 and plan is then to link it to 10 years less than the state pension age (so it will go to 58).

    are there better funds i could/should transfer into? (almost certainly)

    Not all old plans are bad.  Some can be real gems worth keeping.  So, do not assume.

    are there cheaper providers? (definitely i would think!)

    Overall, costs have reduced over the years but some old plans were priced on the contributions more than the annual ongoing.  So, if you are not paying into them, some old ones can be cheaper than modern plans.

    There is insufficient information to go on.  Where did you get the charges from?   Are these from the fund factsheets or are they the actual charges relevant to you? (fund factsheets show the maximum default and not any discounted charges - and most people get some form of discount).


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • carpy
    carpy Posts: 1,090 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    sorry my mistake on the age, i was aware of that.
    i think i'm correct on the charges i've quoted (they're taken from my spreadsheet records and checked against the fund sheets, although on some they're not entirely clear). they're about right.
    the clerical medical one is quite high on charges...
    i'm thinking of maybe consolidating them all into one low cost pot with someone like Vanguard who have very low fees?




  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,653 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    the clerical medical one is quite high on charges...

    Many of the old CM plans had a higher default charge but decent fund based discounts.   Towards the end of their life (before debranded into SW) their plans were very cheap if you had over £20k in them.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • carpy
    carpy Posts: 1,090 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    it's 1.25% but i get a 0.1% reduction for £20k+
  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    carpy said:
    sorry my mistake on the age, i was aware of that.
    i think i'm correct on the charges i've quoted (they're taken from my spreadsheet records and checked against the fund sheets, although on some they're not entirely clear). they're about right.
    the clerical medical one is quite high on charges...
    i'm thinking of maybe consolidating them all into one low cost pot with someone like Vanguard who have very low fees?




    Before you do that, consider the possible advantages of not consolidating them all. See https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pensions/article-3550085/STEVE-WEBB-merge-small-pension-pots.html
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,653 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    carpy said:
    it's 1.25% but i get a 0.1% reduction for £20k+
    That's not good.  We used to get them at 0.5% net of discount for the internal funds.  They did have external funds as well which cost more.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 32,069 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The last one has some kind of guarantee. So this will be more difficult to transfer ( probably will need regulated advice ) and you might be better not giving up the guarantee.
    Also you do not say which one of them is currently active/being subscribed to ? If it is linked to an employer then you will have to probably stick with it.
  • carpy
    carpy Posts: 1,090 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    dunstonh said:
    carpy said:
    it's 1.25% but i get a 0.1% reduction for £20k+
    That's not good.  We used to get them at 0.5% net of discount for the internal funds.  They did have external funds as well which cost more.
    i think it is an external one (going by this list) as listed under 'newton' rather than their own funds.
    The last one has some kind of guarantee. So this will be more difficult to transfer ( probably will need regulated advice ) and you might be better not giving up the guarantee.
    Also you do not say which one of them is currently active/being subscribed to ? If it is linked to an employer then you will have to probably stick with it.
    yes i did think i might keep that one as it's a nice bit of surety 
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.