We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Annual Allowance £40,000
Comments
-
ratechaser:
work out how much NI you have contributed and consider the picture as a whole before you start feeling too guilty0 -
The vast majority of the people will never be in a position to contribute £40k per year into the pension scheme and besides, considering this. The median pension wealth for the adult population with pension provision in 2018 is £60,700 with the DC pension fund much lower than that. Even a few years of £40k contribution pa is more than sufficient to give people with reasonable pension provision.Mick70 said:
if they were paying that in from an early age i would agree , but realistically the vast majority are only ever in the position to do this in the later stages of their careers . I agree about possibly putting an end to the extra tax relief higher earners can claim through their annual tax returns , but not to reduce the annual amount you can pay in (including the govt top up), should be encouraging pensions not discouraging themThrugelmir said:£40k pa limit is sufficient to provide people with an adequate pension provision.2 -
The vast majority of the people will never be in a position to contribute £40k per year into the pension scheme
I think something like 30% have no pension provision at all , although this is an older figure and it will have come down with the roll out of auto enrolment . Although most auto enrollers are not high earners and probably typically less than £2K a year going in.
So worrying about the £40K pa limit is strictly a luxury problem for the Top ten per cent and even than only usually in their later years.
2 -
Given the amount the Government is borrowing to prop up the economy at the current time. £45 billion in April alone. The matter will be off the political agenda for a very long time. One consequence of this crisis hopefully will be a return to a more equitable and fair society. Rather than factions arguing for the benefit of a few on a specific issue. We are all going to pay the cost.Mick70 said:
if they were paying that in from an early age i would agree , but realistically the vast majority are only ever in the position to do this in the later stages of their careers . I agree about possibly putting an end to the extra tax relief higher earners can claim through their annual tax returns , but not to reduce the annual amount you can pay in (including the govt top up), should be encouraging pensions not discouraging themThrugelmir said:£40k pa limit is sufficient to provide people with an adequate pension provision.0 -
Oh certainly, and I vaguely recall the howls of rage when the uncapped 1% (and subsequently 2%) NI charge first came in - because we all know it's just income tax by another name.georgehere said:ratechaser:
work out how much NI you have contributed and consider the picture as a whole before you start feeling too guiltyBut there's 2 sides to this...Firstly in relative terms, I have paid a pretty hefty chunk compared to others that will end up getting the same pension and NHS provision - and as I also have private healthcare (the cost of which is paid for by my employer but which I am taxed on as a benefit in kind), I'm actually using the NHS less than many others. So I could feel aggrieved for paying more than my 'fair' share.
However, secondly... in absolute terms, if my 30 years of NI cons, which started off sub-£100 a year, and only got really big about 10 years ago, were used to fund a D.C. pension, I doubt they would get me an annuity nearly as big as what my state pension will ultimately provide for. And yes I know I will keep on paying NI, although hopefully for not many more years!So I can't grumble all that much...0 -
Hi All
Can I just clarify the £40k allowance, as it covers both mine & employers contributions, which is 10% of my salary a year, am i right in thinking i'd have have to earn £400k P/A to worry about this allowance?
reading a lot of posts worrying about this limit, are people on this forum seriously high earners or that they & their employers are very generous with their contributions? even if it was 25% total contribution, someone would have to earn £160k a year!
also where does the £3,600 limit come from? confused by this
Thanks0 -
You can make extra contributions to a pension, you're not restricted to what's taken out of your pay packet though can usually pay in up to your salary (simplifying here). Also the £40k includes the tax relief (max £8k).
£3600 is the amount you can pay into a pension if you earn £3600 a year or less (doesn't include tax relief) or have taken money out of the pension (excluding the tax free lump sum)0 -
wouldnt £40k be £10k Tax relief? so £50k actually put into the pension?ends up in your pension? either way, its only going to be high salary earners that can put in £40k in a year!LobsterMemory said:You can make extra contributions to a pension, you're not restricted to what's taken out of your pay packet though can usually pay in up to your salary (simplifying here). Also the £40k includes the tax relief (max £8k).
£3600 is the amount you can pay into a pension if you earn £3600 a year or less (doesn't include tax relief) or have taken money out of the pension (excluding the tax free lump sum)
0 -
No, it's £32k + £8I
Yes, it's mainly going to be for high earners but could also be transfer from other savings or windfalls like sale of a house, inheritance or lottery win etc0 -
I think quite a lot of people making this level of pension contribution are typically in their 50's and higher rate taxpayers . They can see retirement in the distance and probably start thinking/learning more about financial issues in more detail. Also by this age many expenses have passed for the lucky ones ( no mortgage, kids grown up etc ) So they increase monthly contributions and use savings for lump sum top ups , to maximise the higher rate tax relief in their final years of working. That is roughly what I have done anyway . It does not quite come to £40K though and was a lot less when I was younger.
1
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards