We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Essential travel

2»

Comments

  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    lisyloo said:
    Stigy said:
    You don't have to be a Ley worker to travel. You are allowed to travel for work if you can't work from home, which clearly, this is a case of.

    Not it isn't. They aren't traveling FOR work.
    They are, they are travelling as part of their job. 
  • Undervalued
    Undervalued Posts: 9,774 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    lisyloo said:
    Stigy said:
    You don't have to be a Ley worker to travel. You are allowed to travel for work if you can't work from home, which clearly, this is a case of.

    Not it isn't. They aren't traveling FOR work.
    Both surely.
    They would be travelling to one of the firm's places of work, at their employer's instruction, to perform a task which cannot be done from home. So if the employer insists the equipment cannot be sent by courier then the work "absolutely" cannot be done from home.

    Realistically, unless their car were to break down it is extremely low risk.

  • General_Grant
    General_Grant Posts: 5,326 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    lisyloo said:
    Stigy said:
    You don't have to be a Ley worker to travel. You are allowed to travel for work if you can't work from home, which clearly, this is a case of.

    Not it isn't. They aren't traveling FOR work.

    It's the work of getting their employer's equipment to them and almost certainly covered by "other duties as reasonably requested" in the JD.
  • Stigy
    Stigy Posts: 1,581 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 8 April 2020 at 11:31AM
    lisyloo said:
    Stigy said:
    You don't have to be a Ley worker to travel. You are allowed to travel for work if you can't work from home, which clearly, this is a case of.

    Not it isn't. They aren't traveling FOR work.

    It's the work of getting their employer's equipment to them and almost certainly covered by "other duties as reasonably requested" in the JD.
    If the Government advice wasn't so wishy-washy, this would no doubt be clearer. However, I think it's pedantic to differentiate between travelling TO work and travelling FOR work. Ironically, your example indicted travelling FOR work, which could mean travelling for work related reasons.

    Either way, it's not illegal and could easily be argued that it is essential travel.
  • KatrinaWaves
    KatrinaWaves Posts: 2,944 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    You're not going to be fined. The return of the equipment could allow someone else to stay home and work from home with your kit. Youre still employed by them and I assume getting paid. Just take the stuff back/.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.