We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is it fair that Govt employees get DB and private sector employees DC (in general)
Comments
-
Fair enough, but that’s what it costs the taxpayer, plus liability for the risk.Thrugelmir said:
That's somewhat misleading. My old quasi public sector employer contributed on the face of it 26.2% of gross salary. When in reality 7% of this contribution was effectively a levy to cover existing liabilities.Deleted_User said:2. The taxpayer contributes 31% to police pensions (if we take one example). That’s a lot.There is a fundamental conflict with Humphrey deciding pension arrangements which will impact his own remuneration while someone else is paying.When business does this kind of thing, they are screwing the shareholders and the liability hurts share prices big time. My old company got sold for next to nothing because of pension liabilities. There are consequences for mismanagement. When the government does it everyone is happy because it’s “nobody’s money”.4 -
D'you really want me to dig out old payslips/P60s to prove it to you?? Believe me, Civil Service (as opposed to some NHS/Local Govt) really don't get paid that much for what they do....as the majority of CS will attest to. You only have to look at the example earlier in the thread of the guy's department trying to recruit a sw engineer - CS can never match private sector salaries for engineering (pretty much any discipline), accountancy, etc., etc.,princeofpounds said:GunJack said:
You expect anyone to take your personal anecdote seriously?
So how come, when I came out of the CS and into private sector I got a 20% pay rise and a DB pension scheme? For less responsibility..and that was not unusual. It makes those studies seem to be a bit, well, wrong....princeofpounds said:I was merely refuting the baseless point that gets made countless times that 'the public sector gets paid less so higher pension entitlements are ok'.......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
3 -
The state is almost a monopoly employer in certain sectors like health. Would it be fair of the state to take advantage of that monopoly power by giving crappy pensions to nurses, doctors, radiographers, physiotherapists etc etc?3
-
I work in the civil service my opposite number in industry has far less responsibility and accountability than I do and earns around £7k pa more than I do plus bonuses on top. They get the same amount as leave as I do and a very similar pension.
With the CS, there is always going to be a ceiling to what you earn, in industry this is less so albeit you need to be analysing roles with clear career progression and not low skilled jobs with no development opportunities.Make £2023 in 2023 (#36) £3479.30/£2023
Make £2024 in 2024...1
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
