We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Voluntary Termination results in Default - STARTLINE

Screwhefner
Posts: 3 Newbie

in Loans
Hi all - excuse me as I am new to this posting lark - usually I tend to drop in for advice but this time have my own topic. I had car finance via Startline from 2014. I VT'd my Ford Focus in November 2016 after paying just over half of the amount (many thanks for the forum for the advice there!). All seemed OK, however when I recently checked my credit file, I was shocked to see a default from February 2017! It is a separate entry on my credit file from the original vehicle finance, which is correctly shown as closed under Section 99 of the CCA.
What I would like opinion on is whether the car finance company can do this? I am considering a mortgage and this obviously devastates all chances of that happening.
I am also concerned as to whether Startline can even make a separate entry on my credit file without my knowledge.
Ideally, I would like to issue proceedings under DPA for this, but am unsure as to what my rights are - can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance!
What I would like opinion on is whether the car finance company can do this? I am considering a mortgage and this obviously devastates all chances of that happening.
I am also concerned as to whether Startline can even make a separate entry on my credit file without my knowledge.
Ideally, I would like to issue proceedings under DPA for this, but am unsure as to what my rights are - can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
-
You wouldn't 'issue proceedings' under DPA. The first thing you would do is query the validity of the marker.
Speak to Startline in the first instance.
1 -
Ah right - after speaking to Startline they tell me that it's in relation to "damage" to the vehicle. They've given me no other evidence. I will send them a letter requesting clarification as to the validity. I know this is cheeky, but what sort of wording would I use?0
-
Screwhefner said:Ah right - after speaking to Startline they tell me that it's in relation to "damage" to the vehicle. They've given me no other evidence. I will send them a letter requesting clarification as to the validity. I know this is cheeky, but what sort of wording would I use?"We act as though comfort and luxury are the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about” – Albert Einstein0
-
I think they are trying it on. I have heard of finance companies incorrectly defaulting VTs before.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards